UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) vs Quadro NVS 300M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated745
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data8.72
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code nameG73Ice Lake G1 Gen. 11
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date24 May 2006 (18 years ago)28 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1332
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speed450 MHz1100 MHz
Number of transistors177 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)16 Watt12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate2.000no data
ROPs2no data
TMUs4no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR4
Maximum RAM amount256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth22.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12_1
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.1no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 24 May 2006 28 May 2019
Chip lithography 90 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 16 Watt 12 Watt

UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) has an age advantage of 13 years, a 800% more advanced lithography process, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 300M and UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU). We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 300M
Quadro NVS 300M
Intel UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)
UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.7 3 votes

Rate Quadro NVS 300M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 364 votes

Rate UHD Graphics G1 (Ice Lake 32 EU) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.