Radeon RX 6900 XTX vs Quadro NVS 300M
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | not rated | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Architecture | no data | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2023) |
| GPU code name | G72GLM | Navi 21 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 24 May 2006 (18 years ago) | 28 October 2020 (3 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 13 | 5120 |
| Core clock speed | 5 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 450 MHz | 2435 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 177 million | 26,800 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 330 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 2.000 | 779.2 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Laptop size | medium sized | no data |
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |
| Length | no data | 267 mm |
| Width | no data | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | 2x 8-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR3 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 16 GB |
| Memory bus width | 128 Bit | 256 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 18 GB/s |
| Memory bandwidth | 22.4 GB/s | 576.0 GB/s |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | No outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 2x DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 9.0c (9_3) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 3.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 2.1 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | N/A | 2.1 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 24 May 2006 | 28 October 2020 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 16 GB |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 7 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 16 Watt | 330 Watt |
NVS 300M has 1962.5% lower power consumption.
RX 6900 XTX, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1185.7% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 300M and Radeon RX 6900 XTX. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 300M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 6900 XTX is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
