Radeon RX 7500 XT vs Quadro NVS 290
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1198 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | 1.95 | no data |
| Architecture | Tesla (2006−2010) | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024) |
| GPU code name | G86 | Navi 33 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 4 October 2007 (17 years ago) | 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $149 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 16 | 1024 |
| Core clock speed | 459 MHz | 1452 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 2300 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 210 million | 13,300 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 80 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 100 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 3.672 | 147.2 |
| Floating-point processing power | 0.02938 TFLOPS | 9.421 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 4 | 32 |
| TMUs | 8 | 64 |
| Ray Tracing Cores | no data | 16 |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 1.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 168 mm | no data |
| Width | 1-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | None | 1x 6-pin |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | DDR2 | GDDR6 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 6 GB |
| Memory bus width | 64 Bit | 96 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 400 MHz | 2250 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 6.4 GB/s | 216.0 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DMS-59 | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 2x DisplayPort 2.1, 1x USB Type-C |
| HDMI | - | + |
API compatibility
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 11.1 (10_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Shader Model | 4.0 | 6.7 |
| OpenGL | 3.3 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.1 | 2.2 |
| Vulkan | N/A | 1.3 |
| CUDA | 1.1 | - |
Pros & cons summary
| Maximum RAM amount | 256 MB | 6 GB |
| Chip lithography | 80 nm | 6 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 21 Watt | 100 Watt |
NVS 290 has 376.2% lower power consumption.
RX 7500 XT, on the other hand, has a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233.3% more advanced lithography process.
We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 290 and Radeon RX 7500 XT. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro NVS 290 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon RX 7500 XT is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
