GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 vs Quadro NVS 280 SD

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureCelsius (1999−2005)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameNV18 C1GK208
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date31 May 2005 (19 years ago)29 May 2013 (11 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed250 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors29 million915 million
Manufacturing process technology150 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt25 Watt
Texture fill rate1.00028.86
Floating-point performanceno data0.6927 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfaceAGP 8xPCIe 2.0 x8
Length168 mm115 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDRDDR3
Maximum RAM amount64 MB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1800 MHz
Memory bandwidth3.2 GB/s14.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DMS-591x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX8.012 (11_0)
Shader Modelno data5.1
OpenGL1.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 May 2005 29 May 2013
Maximum RAM amount 64 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 150 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 25 Watt

NVS 280 SD has 150% lower power consumption.

GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 280 SD and GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 280 SD is a workstation graphics card while GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 280 SD
Quadro NVS 280 SD
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8
GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 280 SD on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 17 votes

Rate GeForce GT 630 Rev. 2 PCIe x8 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.