Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile vs Quadro NVS 130M

Place in the ranking	1360	210
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	1.71	22.49
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G86	TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	9 May 2007 (17 years ago)	27 May 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	8	2304
Core clock speed	400 MHz	945 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1380 MHz
Number of transistors	210 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	80 Watt
Texture fill rate	1.600	198.7
Floating-point processing power	0.0128 TFLOPS	6.359 TFLOPS
ROPs	4	64
TMUs	4	144
Tensor Cores	no data	288
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR2	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	11.2 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	+	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.1	7.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

NVS 130M 0.25

RTX 3000 Mobile 26.26
+10404%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

NVS 130M 97

RTX 3000 Mobile 10116
+10329%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	104
4K	0−1	88

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−2050%

40−45
+2050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2467%	77 +2467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1225%	50−55 +1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −279%	100−110 +279%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1800%	55−60 +1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1225%	50−55 +1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −522%	55−60 +522%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −279%	100−110 +279%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1200%	39 +1200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2550%	50−55 +2550%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2050%	40−45 +2050%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1225%	50−55 +1225%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1400%	120−130 +1400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2125%	85−90 +2125%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −522%	56 +522%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −279%	100−110 +279%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	16−18
Hitman 3	6−7 −417%	30−35 +417%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −2600%	50−55 +2600%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−2100%

40−45
+2100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −1500%	16−18 +1500%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	14−16

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1050%

21−24
+1050%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Battlefield 5	85−90 +0%	85−90 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	90−95 +0%	90−95 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	45−50 +0%	45−50 +0%
Far Cry 5	60−65 +0%	60−65 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

65−70

+0%

65−70

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Far Cry 5	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	150−160 +0%	150−160 +0%
Metro Exodus	50−55 +0%	50−55 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	24−27 +0%	24−27 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Hitman 3	21−24 +0%	21−24 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Metro Exodus	30−33 +0%	30−33 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +0%	27−30 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	7−8 +0%	7−8 +0%
Far Cry 5	14−16 +0%	14−16 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	30−35 +0%	30−35 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Horizon Zero Dawn, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 3000 Mobile is 2600% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 3000 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.25	26.26
Recency	9 May 2007	27 May 2019
Maximum RAM amount	256 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	10 Watt	80 Watt

NVS 130M has 700% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 10404% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro NVS 130M in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.