Data Center GPU Max 1550 vs Quadro NVS 130M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1358not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.74no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.5 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameG86Ponte Vecchio
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date9 May 2007 (17 years ago)10 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores816384
Core clock speed400 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors210 million100,000 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt600 Watt
Texture fill rate1.6001,638
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS52.43 TFLOPS
ROPs4no data
TMUs41024
Tensor Coresno data1024
Ray Tracing Coresno data128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Widthno dataOAM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth11.2 GB/s3,277 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 10 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 600 Watt

NVS 130M has 5900% lower power consumption.

Data Center GPU Max 1550, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, a 51100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro NVS 130M and Data Center GPU Max 1550. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro NVS 130M is a mobile workstation card while Data Center GPU Max 1550 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M
Quadro NVS 130M
Intel Data Center GPU Max 1550
Data Center GPU Max 1550

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro NVS 130M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 21 vote

Rate Data Center GPU Max 1550 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.