UHD Graphics P630 vs Quadro M620

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K2200M Quadro M600M Quadro M620 Quadro M1000M Quadro M1200 Quadro M2000M
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M620 with UHD Graphics P630, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
7.10
+12.2%

M620 outperforms UHD Graphics P630 by a moderate 12% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro M620 Quadro M620
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking553584
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.5029.41
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Generation 9.5 (2016−2020)
GPU code nameGM107Coffee Lake GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (8 years ago)24 May 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores512192
Core clock speed756 MHz350 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz1200 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate31.2628.80
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS0.4608 TFLOPS
ROPs163
TMUs3224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)Ring Bus
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed1253 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth80 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro M620 7.10
+12.2%
UHD Graphics P630 6.33

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M620 2765
+12.2%
UHD Graphics P630 2465

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD26
+23.8%
21−24
−23.8%
4K10
+25%
8−9
−25%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Fortnite 40−45
+13.9%
35−40
−13.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Valorant 70−75
+7.4%
65−70
−7.4%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Battlefield 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 110−120
+10%
100−105
−10%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Fortnite 40−45
+13.9%
35−40
−13.9%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
Metro Exodus 12−14
+18.2%
10−12
−18.2%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 19
+18.8%
16−18
−18.8%
Valorant 70−75
+7.4%
65−70
−7.4%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+11.5%
24−27
−11.5%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+7.7%
12−14
−7.7%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Dota 2 50−55
+8.2%
45−50
−8.2%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+16.7%
18−20
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 30−33
+11.1%
27−30
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
+13.6%
21−24
−13.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−60%
16−18
+60%
Valorant 70−75
+7.4%
65−70
−7.4%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+13.9%
35−40
−13.9%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+12.5%
8−9
−12.5%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+13%
45−50
−13%
Grand Theft Auto V 8−9
+14.3%
7−8
−14.3%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+5.4%
35−40
−5.4%
Valorant 75−80
+13.2%
65−70
−13.2%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 12−14
+33.3%
9−10
−33.3%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 16−18
+14.3%
14−16
−14.3%
Forza Horizon 5 10−12
+10%
10−11
−10%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 14−16
+16.7%
12−14
−16.7%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 6−7
+20%
5−6
−20%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
+5.9%
16−18
−5.9%
Metro Exodus 2−3
+100%
1−2
−100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
+66.7%
3−4
−66.7%
Valorant 30−35
+9.7%
30−35
−9.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+50%
4−5
−50%
Counter-Strike 2 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
+0%
2−3
+0%
Dota 2 24−27
+14.3%
21−24
−14.3%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%
Forza Horizon 4 10−11
+11.1%
9−10
−11.1%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
+16.7%
6−7
−16.7%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%

This is how Quadro M620 and UHD Graphics P630 compete in popular games:

  • Quadro M620 is 24% faster in 1080p
  • Quadro M620 is 25% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Metro Exodus, with 4K resolution and the High Preset, the Quadro M620 is 100% faster.
  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the UHD Graphics P630 is 60% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Quadro M620 is ahead in 59 tests (88%)
  • UHD Graphics P630 is ahead in 1 test (1%)
  • there's a draw in 7 tests (10%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.10 6.33
Recency 11 January 2017 24 May 2018
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 15 Watt

Quadro M620 has a 12.2% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics P630, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 100% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M620 is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics P630 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics P630 is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
Intel UHD Graphics P630
UHD Graphics P630
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
K4100M Quadro K4100M
UHD Graphics P630 UHD Graphics P630
vs
GeForce MX330 GeForce MX330
Quadro M620 Quadro M620
vs
Pro 450 Radeon Pro 450
9200M GS NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS
vs
9500 GS Rev. 2 GeForce 9500 GS Rev. 2
GT 1030 DDR4 NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 DDR4
vs
T1000 Mobile Quadro T1000 Mobile
RTX 4090 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090
vs
Voodoo5 5000 PCI
GTX 750 Ti NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti
vs
FX 1500 FX 1500
GTX 1660 Ti Mobile NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Mobile
vs
6600 GT Dual GeForce 6600 GT Dual
R5 M430 AMD Radeon R5 M430
vs
HD 8470D HD 8470D
ATI Mobility HD 5650 ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5650
vs
ATI Mobility HD 2600 Mobility Radeon HD 2600
R9 M380 AMD Radeon R9 M380
vs
GT 730 GT 730
UHD Graphics 605 Intel UHD Graphics 605
vs
Arc A580 Arc A580
GTX 980 NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980
vs
Jetson Orin Nano 8 GB Orin Nano 8 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 196 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 50 votes

Rate UHD Graphics P630 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M620 or UHD Graphics P630, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.