Radeon RX 7900M vs Quadro M620

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M620 with Radeon RX 7900M, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M620
2017
2 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
7.25

RX 7900M outperforms M620 by a whopping 722% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking54033
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency16.5722.69
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM107Navi 31
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)19 October 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5124608
Core clock speed756 MHz1825 MHz
Boost clock speed977 MHz2090 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million57,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt180 Watt
Texture fill rate31.26601.9
Floating-point processing power1 TFLOPS38.52 TFLOPS
ROPs16192
TMUs32288
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount2 GB16 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.0-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M620 7.25
RX 7900M 59.57
+722%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M620 2793
RX 7900M 22956
+722%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Quadro M620 3801
RX 7900M 59943
+1477%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M620 3130
RX 7900M 50241
+1505%

3DMark Time Spy Graphics

Quadro M620 862
RX 7900M 19434
+2155%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD27
−519%
167
+519%
1440p14−16
−757%
120
+757%
4K12−14
−725%
99
+725%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−561%
110−120
+561%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−767%
180−190
+767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−620%
100−110
+620%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−590%
130−140
+590%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−367%
220−230
+367%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−407%
210−220
+407%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−629%
150−160
+629%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−854%
220−230
+854%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−561%
110−120
+561%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Battlefield 5 21−24
−767%
180−190
+767%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−620%
100−110
+620%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Far Cry New Dawn 20−22
−590%
130−140
+590%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−367%
220−230
+367%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−407%
210−220
+407%
Metro Exodus 21−24
−629%
150−160
+629%
Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−854%
220−230
+854%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 62
−91.9%
110−120
+91.9%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
−561%
110−120
+561%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−11
−900%
100−105
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 14−16
−620%
100−110
+620%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
−692%
95−100
+692%
Far Cry 5 16−18
−581%
100−110
+581%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
−367%
220−230
+367%
Hitman 3 14−16
−743%
110−120
+743%
Horizon Zero Dawn 40−45
−407%
210−220
+407%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27
−1333%
344
+1333%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10
−1580%
168
+1580%
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
−172%
140−150
+172%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 20−22
−470%
110−120
+470%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 14−16
−779%
120−130
+779%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−12
−709%
85−90
+709%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8
−829%
65−70
+829%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−2200%
65−70
+2200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−871%
65−70
+871%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−700%
24−27
+700%
Far Cry 5 8−9
−738%
65−70
+738%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
−938%
270−280
+938%
Hitman 3 10−12
−636%
80−85
+636%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−807%
130−140
+807%
Metro Exodus 8−9
−1150%
100−105
+1150%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 5−6
−4880%
249
+4880%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−1500%
95−100
+1500%
Watch Dogs: Legion 45−50
−398%
220−230
+398%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 12−14
−717%
95−100
+717%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−967%
60−65
+967%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−980%
50−55
+980%
Hitman 3 3−4
−1500%
45−50
+1500%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−808%
210−220
+808%
Metro Exodus 5−6
−1560%
80−85
+1560%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5
−2800%
116
+2800%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 4−5
−1000%
40−45
+1000%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4
−1300%
40−45
+1300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−1267%
40−45
+1267%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−700%
8−9
+700%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−850%
35−40
+850%
Forza Horizon 4 8−9
−1000%
85−90
+1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 2−3
−6450%
131
+6450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 2−3
−1550%
30−35
+1550%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−700%
55−60
+700%

This is how Quadro M620 and RX 7900M compete in popular games:

  • RX 7900M is 519% faster in 1080p
  • RX 7900M is 757% faster in 1440p
  • RX 7900M is 725% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RX 7900M is 6450% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, RX 7900M surpassed Quadro M620 in all 66 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.25 59.57
Recency 11 January 2017 19 October 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 180 Watt

Quadro M620 has 500% lower power consumption.

RX 7900M, on the other hand, has a 721.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7900M is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M620 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M620 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX 7900M is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M620
Quadro M620
AMD Radeon RX 7900M
Radeon RX 7900M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 195 votes

Rate Quadro M620 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 58 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7900M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.