Tesla P100 DGXS vs Quadro M6000

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking178not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.24no data
Power efficiency8.43no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM200GP100
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date21 March 2015 (9 years ago)5 April 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,199.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723584
Core clock speed988 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1480 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate213.9331.5
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs9696
TMUs192224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount12 GB16 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz715 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s732.2 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.26.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 21 March 2015 5 April 2016
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 300 Watt

Quadro M6000 has 20% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 DGXS, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M6000 and Tesla P100 DGXS. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000
Quadro M6000
NVIDIA Tesla P100 DGXS
Tesla P100 DGXS

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 148 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Tesla P100 DGXS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.