T1200 Mobile vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro M2000 Quadro M3000 SE Quadro M4000 Quadro M5000 Quadro M5000 SE Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000 24 GB
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB with T1200 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.42
+52.3%

M6000 24 GB outperforms T1200 Mobile by an impressive 52% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
T1200 Mobile T1200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking192284
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.16no data
Power efficiency8.4514.60
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM200no data
Market segmentWorkstationMobile workstation
Release date5 March 2016 (8 years ago)12 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30721024
Core clock speed988 MHz855 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1425 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt95 Watt (35 - 95 Watt TGP)
Texture fill rate285.2no data
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPSno data
ROPs96no data
TMUs256no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz10000 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPortno data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.6no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

M6000 24 GB 30.42
+52.3%
T1200 Mobile 19.98

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M6000 24 GB 11834
+52.2%
T1200 Mobile 7775

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD90−95
+50%
60
−50%
1440p45−50
+40.6%
32
−40.6%
4K130−140
+44.4%
90
−44.4%

Cost per frame, $

1080p55.54no data
1440p111.09no data
4K38.45no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Far Cry 5 65
+0%
65
+0%
Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 114
+0%
114
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 71
+0%
71
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 71
+0%
71
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Dota 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Far Cry 5 56
+0%
56
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 40
+0%
40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 37
+0%
37
+0%
Valorant 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 37
+0%
37
+0%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Far Cry 5 41
+0%
41
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Valorant 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 8−9
+0%
8−9
+0%
Dota 2 109
+0%
109
+0%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how M6000 24 GB and T1200 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • M6000 24 GB is 50% faster in 1080p
  • M6000 24 GB is 41% faster in 1440p
  • M6000 24 GB is 44% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 30.42 19.98
Recency 5 March 2016 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 95 Watt

M6000 24 GB has a 52.3% higher aggregate performance score, and a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

T1200 Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 163.2% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M6000 24 GB is our recommended choice as it beats the T1200 Mobile in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M6000 24 GB is a workstation card while T1200 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
NVIDIA T1200 Mobile
T1200
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Pro 5700 Radeon Pro 5700
T1200 Mobile T1200 Mobile
vs
Pro 580 Radeon Pro 580
M6000 24 GB Quadro M6000 24 GB
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake) UHD Graphics 32EUs (Alder Lake)
vs
Quadro P400 Quadro P400
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
vs
Tesla P40 Tesla P40
GTX 580M GeForce GTX 580M
vs
Quadro M2000 Quadro M2000
RTX A3000 Mobile RTX A3000 Mobile
vs
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 16 GB
vs
M6000 24 GB M6000 24 GB
T600 T600
vs
Tesla M6 Tesla M6
Arc A310 Arc A310
vs
Tesla M60 Tesla M60
Quadro P520 Quadro P520
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
RX 7900 XT Radeon RX 7900 XT
vs
Quadro M6000 Quadro M6000
GeForce 920MX GeForce 920MX
vs
Quadro K1200 Quadro K1200

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4.4 17 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 5 votes

Rate T1200 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro M6000 24 GB or T1200 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.