Radeon Pro WX 8200 vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB and Radeon Pro WX 8200, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.80

Pro WX 8200 outperforms M6000 24 GB by a moderate 14% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking178144
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.7825.18
Power efficiency8.5910.63
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameGM200Vega 10
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2016 (8 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 $999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Pro WX 8200 has 806% better value for money than M6000 24 GB.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30723584
Core clock speed988 MHz1200 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1500 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt230 Watt
Texture fill rate285.2336.0
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS10.75 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs256224

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2
Maximum RAM amount24 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit2048 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz1000 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort4x mini-DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_1)
Shader Model6.46.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.1.125
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M6000 24 GB 30.80
Pro WX 8200 35.06
+13.8%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M6000 24 GB 11882
Pro WX 8200 13526
+13.8%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.80 35.06
Recency 5 March 2016 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 230 Watt

M6000 24 GB has a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Pro WX 8200, on the other hand, has a 13.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 8.7% lower power consumption.

The Radeon Pro WX 8200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M6000 24 GB in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
AMD Radeon Pro WX 8200
Radeon Pro WX 8200

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 27 votes

Rate Radeon Pro WX 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.