Radeon Pro SSG vs Quadro M6000 24 GB

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M6000 24 GB and Radeon Pro SSG, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

M6000 24 GB
2016
24 GB GDDR5, 250 Watt
30.79
+8.3%

M6000 24 GB outperforms Pro SSG by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking176194
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.781.06
Power efficiency8.537.57
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGM200Fiji
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date5 March 2016 (8 years ago)26 July 2016 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$4,999 $9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

M6000 24 GB has 162% better value for money than Pro SSG.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores30724096
Core clock speed988 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speed1114 MHz1050 MHz
Number of transistors8,000 million8,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)250 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate285.2268.8
Floating-point processing power6.844 TFLOPS8.602 TFLOPS
ROPs9664
TMUs256256

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 8-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM
Maximum RAM amount24 GB4 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit4096 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz500 MHz
Memory bandwidth317.4 GB/s512.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort1x HDMI 1.4a, 3x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
HDMI-+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (12_1)12 (12_0)
Shader Model6.46.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.22.1
Vulkan+1.2.170
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M6000 24 GB 30.79
+8.3%
Pro SSG 28.43

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M6000 24 GB 11882
+8.3%
Pro SSG 10971

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 30.79 28.43
Recency 5 March 2016 26 July 2016
Maximum RAM amount 24 GB 4 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 250 Watt 260 Watt

M6000 24 GB has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 4% lower power consumption.

Pro SSG, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 months.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Quadro M6000 24 GB and Radeon Pro SSG.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB
Quadro M6000 24 GB
AMD Radeon Pro SSG
Radeon Pro SSG

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 16 votes

Rate Quadro M6000 24 GB on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.1 3258 votes

Rate Radeon Pro SSG on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.