UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) vs Quadro M5000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M5000M with UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), including specs and performance data.

M5000M
2015
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
18.19
+153%

M5000M outperforms UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) by a whopping 153% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking298538
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.12no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Gen. 12 (2021−2023)
GPU code nameGM204Alder Lake Xe
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date18 August 2015 (9 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1,53664
Core clock speed975 MHzno data
Boost clock speed1051 MHz1400 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Wattno data
Texture fill rate93.60no data
Floating-point processing power2.995 TFLOPSno data
ROPs64no data
TMUs96no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount8 GBno data
Memory bus width256 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1253 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth160 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Quick Syncno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_1
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M5000M 18.19
+153%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 7.20

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

M5000M 11845
+135%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 5039

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

M5000M 9228
+137%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 3895

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

M5000M 63738
+193%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 21761

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

M5000M 324161
+54.7%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 209544

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 maya-04

M5000M 71
+127%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 31

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 sw-03

M5000M 103
+165%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 39

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 snx-02

M5000M 88
+2474%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 3

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 catia-04

M5000M 97
+223%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 30

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 creo-01

M5000M 82
+344%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 18

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 mediacal-01

M5000M 32
+288%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 8

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 showcase-01

M5000M 44
+192%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 15

SPECviewperf 12 - specvp12 energy-01

M5000M 7
+1083%
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) 1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD85
+305%
21
−305%
1440p30−35
+150%
12
−150%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+55.6%
18
−55.6%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+66.7%
18
−66.7%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+140%
14−16
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+86.7%
15
−86.7%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+140%
20−22
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+140%
45−50
−140%
Hitman 3 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+110%
40−45
−110%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+210%
20−22
−210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+146%
24−27
−146%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+59.3%
50−55
−59.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+100%
15
−100%
Battlefield 5 55−60
+181%
21−24
−181%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+140%
14−16
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+155%
11
−155%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+140%
20−22
−140%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+140%
45−50
−140%
Hitman 3 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+110%
40−45
−110%
Metro Exodus 60−65
+210%
20−22
−210%
Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+127%
26
−127%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 126
+473%
21−24
−473%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+59.3%
50−55
−59.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 40−45
+122%
18−20
−122%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 30−33
+233%
9−10
−233%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 35−40
+140%
14−16
−140%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+155%
10−12
−155%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+163%
16−18
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 110−120
+140%
45−50
−140%
Hitman 3 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+418%
17
−418%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 55−60
+195%
20
−195%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 38
+245%
11
−245%
Watch Dogs: Legion 85−90
+59.3%
50−55
−59.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 45−50
+145%
20−22
−145%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 35−40
+150%
14−16
−150%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+145%
10−12
−145%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 18−20
+157%
7−8
−157%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
+700%
2−3
−700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 20−22
+186%
7−8
−186%
Cyberpunk 2077 10−11
+233%
3−4
−233%
Far Cry 5 21−24
+163%
8−9
−163%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+292%
24−27
−292%
Hitman 3 21−24
+90.9%
10−12
−90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+140%
14−16
−140%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+313%
8−9
−313%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
+600%
5−6
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20−22
+233%
6−7
−233%
Watch Dogs: Legion 100−110
+140%
45−50
−140%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−33
+150%
12−14
−150%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 18−20
+200%
6−7
−200%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+160%
5−6
−160%
Hitman 3 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Horizon Zero Dawn 90−95
+300%
21−24
−300%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+375%
4−5
−375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
+350%
4−5
−350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+200%
3−4
−200%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Far Cry 5 10−11
+150%
4−5
−150%
Forza Horizon 4 24−27
+200%
8−9
−200%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 16−18
+129%
7−8
−129%

This is how M5000M and UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) compete in popular games:

  • M5000M is 305% faster in 1080p
  • M5000M is 150% faster in 1440p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Shadow of the Tomb Raider, with 4K resolution and the Ultra Preset, the M5000M is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, M5000M surpassed UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in all 72 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.19 7.20
Recency 18 August 2015 4 January 2022
Chip lithography 28 nm 10 nm

M5000M has a 152.6% higher aggregate performance score.

UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen), on the other hand, has an age advantage of 6 years, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro M5000M is our recommended choice as it beats the UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M5000M is a mobile workstation card while UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M5000M
Quadro M5000M
Intel UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)
UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen)

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 138 votes

Rate Quadro M5000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 329 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 64EUs (Alder Lake 12th Gen) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.