GeForce 805A vs Quadro M5000
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in performance ranking | 211 | not rated |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 8.59 | no data |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 (2015−2019) | Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015) |
| GPU code name | GM204 | GK208 |
| Market segment | Workstation | Desktop |
| Release date | 29 June 2015 (9 years ago) | 22 July 2014 (10 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $2,856.99 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.
Detailed specifications
General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2048 | 192 |
| Core clock speed | 861 MHz | 719 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 1038 MHz | 758 MHz |
| Number of transistors | 5,200 million | 915 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | 132.9 | 12.13 |
| Floating-point performance | 4,252 gflops | 297.6 gflops |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Length | 267 mm | no data |
| Width | 2-slot | no data |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 6-pin | no data |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR5 | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory bus width | 256 Bit | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | 6612 MHz | 2002 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | 211.6 GB/s | 16.02 GB/s |
Connectivity and outputs
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 4x DisplayPort | No outputs |
API compatibility
List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 (11_0) |
| Shader Model | 6.4 | 5.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1.126 | 1.1.126 |
| CUDA | 5.2 | 3.5 |
Pros & cons summary
| Recency | 29 June 2015 | 22 July 2014 |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | 1 GB |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 150 Watt | 15 Watt |
Quadro M5000 has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount.
GeForce 805A, on the other hand, has 900% lower power consumption.
We couldn't decide between Quadro M5000 and GeForce 805A. We've got no test results to judge.
Be aware that Quadro M5000 is a workstation graphics card while GeForce 805A is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Comparisons with similar GPUs
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
