ATI Radeon X1650 XT vs Quadro M4000

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking314not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.46no data
Power efficiency9.97no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)R500 (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGM204RV560
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date29 June 2015 (9 years ago)30 October 2006 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$791 $199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1664no data
Core clock speed773 MHz525 MHz
Number of transistors5,200 million330 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt55 Watt
Texture fill rate80.394.200
Floating-point processing power2.573 TFLOPSno data
ROPs648
TMUs1048

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1 x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 192 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPort2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Number of simultaneous displays4no data
Multi-display synchronizationQuadro Syncno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
High-Performance Video I/O6+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 June 2015 30 October 2006
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 256 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 55 Watt

Quadro M4000 has an age advantage of 8 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 185.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1650 XT, on the other hand, has 118.2% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M4000 and Radeon X1650 XT. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M4000 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X1650 XT is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M4000
Quadro M4000
ATI Radeon X1650 XT
Radeon X1650 XT

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 230 votes

Rate Quadro M4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 9 votes

Rate Radeon X1650 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.