ATI Radeon X700 PRO AGP vs Quadro M2200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking	420	not rated
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code name	N17P-Q3	RV410
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Desktop
Release date	13 January 2017 (7 years ago)	1 September 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	no data
Core clock speed	694 MHz	425 MHz
Boost clock speed	1038 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	1870 Million	120 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	33 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	3.400
Floating-point performance	2.122 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	AGP 8x
Width	no data	1-slot
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	DDR
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	5508 MHz	944 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	15.1 GB/s
Shared memory	-	no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model	6.4	no data
OpenGL	4.5	2.0
OpenCL	1.2	N/A
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	-

Pros & cons summary

---

Recency	13 January 2017	1 September 2004
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	128 MB
Chip lithography	28 nm	110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	33 Watt

---

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

---