ATI Radeon X1600 vs Quadro M2200

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with Radeon X1600, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.02
+8377%

M2200 outperforms ATI X1600 by a whopping 8377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking4231438
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.780.33
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Ultra-Threaded SE (2005−2007)
GPU code nameGM206RV516
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)2007 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed695 MHz635 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million105 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm90 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt27 Watt
Texture fill rate66.302.540
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPSno data
ROPs324
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2
Maximum RAM amount4 GB512 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz800 MBps
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX129.0c (9_3)
Shader Model6.43.0
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.02
+8377%
ATI X1600 0.13

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro M2200 4248
+8569%
ATI X1600 49

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD440−1
4K14-0−1

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 0−1

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Battlefield 5 35−40 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 0−1
Metro Exodus 35−40 0−1
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 0−1

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18 0−1
Far Cry 5 24−27 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 70−75 0−1
Hitman 3 21−24 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 0−1

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35 0−1

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18 0−1

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6 0−1
Far Cry 5 12−14 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 50−55 0−1
Hitman 3 14−16 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24 0−1
Metro Exodus 16−18 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70 0−1

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20 0−1

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9 0−1
Hitman 3 7−8 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55 0−1
Metro Exodus 9−10 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 6−7 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 14−16 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11 0−1

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.02 0.13
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 90 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 27 Watt

Quadro M2200 has a 8376.9% higher aggregate performance score, a 700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221.4% more advanced lithography process.

ATI X1600, on the other hand, has 103.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X1600 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Radeon X1600 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
ATI Radeon X1600
Radeon X1600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 374 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 59 votes

Rate Radeon X1600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.