Quadro4 400 NVS PCI vs Quadro M2200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking420not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.96no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Celsius (1999−2005)
GPU code nameGM206NV17 A3
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)16 July 2004 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024no data
Core clock speed695 MHz220 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHzno data
Number of transistors2,940 million29 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt18 Watt
Texture fill rate66.300.88
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPSno data
ROPs322
TMUs644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCI
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB64 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz166 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s5.312 GB/s
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x LFH60
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX128.0
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.51.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 January 2017 16 July 2004
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 64 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 18 Watt

Quadro M2200 has an age advantage of 12 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

Quadro4 400 NVS PCI, on the other hand, has 205.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M2200 and Quadro4 400 NVS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while Quadro4 400 NVS PCI is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
NVIDIA Quadro4 400 NVS PCI
Quadro4 400 NVS PCI

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 366 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro4 400 NVS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.