Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile vs Quadro M2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2200 with GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro M2200
2017
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
11.03

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile outperforms M2200 by a moderate 15% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking424395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency13.74no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGM206no data
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date11 January 2017 (7 years ago)April 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1024768
Core clock speed695 MHz1366 MHz
Boost clock speed1036 MHz1442 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate66.30no data
Floating-point processing power2.122 TFLOPSno data
ROPs32no data
TMUs64no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount4 GB3 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed1377 MHz1752 MHz
Memory bandwidth88 GB/s84 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Stereo+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data
Multi-Projectionno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12no data
Shader Model6.4no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan1.1.126+
CUDA5.2-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.03
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 12.63
+14.5%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Quadro M2200 5850
Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile 6401
+9.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD44
−13.6%
50−55
+13.6%
4K14
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Battlefield 5 35−40
−14.3%
40−45
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Far Cry New Dawn 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Metro Exodus 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−3.4%
30−33
+3.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 21−24
−9.1%
24−27
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Far Cry 5 24−27
−3.8%
27−30
+3.8%
Forza Horizon 4 70−75
−9.6%
80−85
+9.6%
Hitman 3 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 55−60
−10.2%
65−70
+10.2%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 35−40
−11.1%
40−45
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 20
−5%
21−24
+5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−13.6%
75−80
+13.6%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 30−35
−12.9%
35−40
+12.9%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 21−24
−14.3%
24−27
+14.3%
Far Cry New Dawn 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Far Cry 5 12−14
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
−7.8%
55−60
+7.8%
Hitman 3 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−4.3%
24−27
+4.3%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−5.9%
18−20
+5.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 16−18
−12.5%
18−20
+12.5%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−9.1%
12−14
+9.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion 65−70
−8.7%
75−80
+8.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Hitman 3 7−8
−14.3%
8−9
+14.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 50−55
−10%
55−60
+10%
Metro Exodus 9−10
−11.1%
10−11
+11.1%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 13
−7.7%
14−16
+7.7%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
+0%
5−6
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
+0%
1−2
+0%
Far Cry 5 6−7
+0%
6−7
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−14.3%
16−18
+14.3%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−12.5%
9−10
+12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%

This is how Quadro M2200 and Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile compete in popular games:

  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 14% faster in 1080p
  • Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is 14% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 11.03 12.63
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 3 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 14 nm

Quadro M2200 has a 136433.3% higher maximum VRAM amount.

Nvidia GTX 1050 3GB Mobile, on the other hand, has a 14.5% higher aggregate performance score, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2200 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2200
Quadro M2200
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile
GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 376 votes

Rate Quadro M2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 114 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1050 3GB Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.