ATI FirePro M7740 vs Quadro M2200

Place in the ranking	420	861
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	14.34	2.51
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code name	GM206	M97
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Mobile workstation
Release date	11 January 2017 (7 years ago)	4 August 2009 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1024	640
Core clock speed	695 MHz	650 MHz
Boost clock speed	1036 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	2,940 million	826 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	60 Watt
Texture fill rate	66.30	20.80
Floating-point processing power	2.122 TFLOPS	0.832 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	16
TMUs	64	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	large
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 2.0 x16
Supplementary power connectors	None	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	1377 MHz	846 MHz
Memory bandwidth	88 GB/s	54.14 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Stereo	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	10.1 (10_1)
Shader Model	6.4	4.1
OpenGL	4.5	3.3
OpenCL	1.2	1.1
Vulkan	1.1.126	N/A
CUDA	5.2	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro M2200 11.04
+423%

ATI M7740 2.11

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

Quadro M2200 24622
+272%

ATI M7740 6626

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	43 +438%	8−9 −438%
4K	14 +600%	2−3 −600%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

16−18
+240%

5−6

−240%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +1650%	2−3 −1650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +711%	9−10 −711%
Hitman 3	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +228%	18−20 −228%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Battlefield 5	35−40 +1650%	2−3 −1650%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Far Cry New Dawn	30−35 +520%	5−6 −520%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +711%	9−10 −711%
Hitman 3	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +228%	18−20 −228%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +500%	6−7 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	30−35 +675%	4−5 −675%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	27−30 +142%	12−14 −142%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	24−27 +271%	7−8 −271%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +340%	5−6 −340%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Far Cry 5	24−27 +767%	3−4 −767%
Forza Horizon 4	70−75 +711%	9−10 −711%
Hitman 3	21−24 +200%	7−8 −200%
Horizon Zero Dawn	55−60 +228%	18−20 −228%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +260%	10−11 −260%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	20 +66.7%	12−14 −66.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +83.3%	35−40 −83.3%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

30−35
+675%

4−5

−675%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	21−24 +600%	3−4 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Far Cry 5	12−14 +550%	2−3 −550%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +467%	9−10 −467%
Hitman 3	14−16 +100%	7−8 −100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +283%	6−7 −283%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +467%	3−4 −467%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 +433%	3−4 −433%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10−12 +1000%	1−2 −1000%
Watch Dogs: Legion	65−70 +475%	12−14 −475%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

18−20
+260%

5−6

−260%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11	0−1
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Hitman 3	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Horizon Zero Dawn	50−55 +456%	9−10 −456%
Metro Exodus	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	13 +550%	2−3 −550%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	6−7 +200%	2−3 −200%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Forza Horizon 4	14−16 +600%	2−3 −600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Watch Dogs: Legion	4−5	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11
+233%

3−4

−233%

This is how Quadro M2200 and ATI M7740 compete in popular games:

Quadro M2200 is 438% faster in 1080p
Quadro M2200 is 600% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Battlefield 5, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Quadro M2200 is 1650% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, Quadro M2200 surpassed ATI M7740 in all 54 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.04	2.11
Recency	11 January 2017	4 August 2009
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	1 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	60 Watt

Quadro M2200 has a 423.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 42.9% more advanced lithography process, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Quadro M2200 is our recommended choice as it beats the FirePro M7740 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.