Quadro RTX 8000 vs Quadro M2000M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro M2000M with Quadro RTX 8000, including specs and performance data.

M2000M
2015
4 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
8.97

RTX 8000 outperforms M2000M by a whopping 460% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking49361
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data2.02
Power efficiency11.2513.32
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGM107TU102
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date3 December 2015 (9 years ago)13 August 2018 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$9,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6404608
Core clock speed1029 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speed1098 MHz1770 MHz
Number of transistors1,870 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt260 Watt
Texture fill rate43.92509.8
Floating-point processing power1.405 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs1696
TMUs40288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB48 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth80 GB/s672.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.0
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA5.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

M2000M 8.97
RTX 8000 50.23
+460%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

M2000M 3446
RTX 8000 19305
+460%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

M2000M 9784
RTX 8000 147323
+1406%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

M2000M 9564
RTX 8000 122427
+1180%

GeekBench 5 CUDA

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

M2000M 10438
RTX 8000 144049
+1280%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35
−443%
190−200
+443%
4K12
−442%
65−70
+442%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data52.63
4Kno data153.83

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
Valorant 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Dota 2 20
−450%
110−120
+450%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−453%
210−220
+453%
Fortnite 50−55
−447%
290−300
+447%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
Grand Theft Auto V 30
−433%
160−170
+433%
Metro Exodus 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−400%
350−400
+400%
Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27
−442%
130−140
+442%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
−456%
150−160
+456%
Valorant 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%
World of Tanks 130−140
−430%
700−750
+430%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 27−30
−452%
160−170
+452%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
−456%
100−105
+456%
Dota 2 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Far Cry 5 35−40
−453%
210−220
+453%
Forza Horizon 4 35−40
−456%
200−210
+456%
Forza Horizon 5 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 70−75
−400%
350−400
+400%
Valorant 30−35
−459%
190−200
+459%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Grand Theft Auto V 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
−458%
240−250
+458%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
World of Tanks 65−70
−438%
350−400
+438%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
−459%
95−100
+459%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
−431%
170−180
+431%
Cyberpunk 2077 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Far Cry 5 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Forza Horizon 4 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Forza Horizon 5 12−14
−438%
70−75
+438%
Metro Exodus 16−18
−431%
85−90
+431%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−442%
65−70
+442%
Valorant 21−24
−445%
120−130
+445%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Dota 2 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Grand Theft Auto V 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Metro Exodus 4−5
−425%
21−24
+425%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 24−27
−438%
140−150
+438%
Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 8−9
−400%
40−45
+400%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−433%
16−18
+433%
Dota 2 18−20
−426%
100−105
+426%
Far Cry 5 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Fortnite 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%
Forza Horizon 4 10−12
−445%
60−65
+445%
Forza Horizon 5 6−7
−400%
30−33
+400%
Valorant 9−10
−456%
50−55
+456%

This is how M2000M and RTX 8000 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 8000 is 443% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 8000 is 442% faster in 4K

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.97 50.23
Recency 3 December 2015 13 August 2018
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 48 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 260 Watt

M2000M has 372.7% lower power consumption.

RTX 8000, on the other hand, has a 460% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro RTX 8000 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro RTX 8000 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000M
Quadro M2000M
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 8000
Quadro RTX 8000

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 503 votes

Rate Quadro M2000M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 465 votes

Rate Quadro RTX 8000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.