Radeon PRO V710 vs Quadro M2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking441not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.59no data
Power efficiency9.49no data
ArchitectureMaxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGM206Navi 32
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date8 April 2016 (8 years ago)3 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$437.75 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7683456
Core clock speed796 MHz1900 MHz
Boost clock speed1163 MHz2000 MHz
Number of transistors2,940 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)75 Watt158 Watt
Texture fill rate55.82432.0
Floating-point processing power1.786 TFLOPS27.65 TFLOPS
ROPs3296
TMUs48216
Ray Tracing Coresno data54

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length201 mmno data
Width1" (2.5 cm)1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type128 BitGDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB28 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit224 Bit
Memory clock speed1653 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidthUp to 106 GB/s504.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors4x DisplayPortNo outputs
Number of simultaneous displays4no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Desktop Management+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model6.46.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.22.2
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA5.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 April 2016 3 October 2024
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 28 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 75 Watt 158 Watt

Quadro M2000 has 110.7% lower power consumption.

PRO V710, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 600% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro M2000 and Radeon PRO V710. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro M2000
Quadro M2000
AMD Radeon PRO V710
Radeon PRO V710

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 209 votes

Rate Quadro M2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon PRO V710 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.