GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs Quadro M2000

Place in the ranking	442	114
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	3.77	no data
Power efficiency	9.53	18.10
Architecture	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	GM206	TU104
Market segment	Workstation	Laptop
Release date	8 April 2016 (8 years ago)	2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$437.75	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	3072
Core clock speed	796 MHz	1365 MHz
Boost clock speed	1163 MHz	1560 MHz
Number of transistors	2,940 million	13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt
Texture fill rate	55.82	299.5
Floating-point processing power	1.786 TFLOPS	9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	48	192
Tensor Cores	no data	384
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	48

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	no data	large
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	201 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	no data
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1653 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 106 GB/s	448.0 GB/s
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	4x DisplayPort	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
VR Ready	no data	+
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model	6.4	6.5
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	1.1.126	1.2.140
CUDA	5.2	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	35−40 −289%	136 +289%
1440p	24−27 −292%	94 +292%
4K	16−18 −319%	67 +319%

Cost per frame, $

1080p	12.51	no data
1440p	18.24	no data
4K	27.36	no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Elden Ring	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	104 +0%	104 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	265 +0%	265 +0%
Metro Exodus	116 +0%	116 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	121 +0%	121 +0%
Valorant	216 +0%	216 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	100−110 +0%	100−110 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	142 +0%	142 +0%
Elden Ring	130−140 +0%	130−140 +0%
Far Cry 5	96 +0%	96 +0%
Fortnite	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	217 +0%	217 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	136 +0%	136 +0%
Metro Exodus	92 +0%	92 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	66 +0%	66 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	140−150 +0%	140−150 +0%
Valorant	127 +0%	127 +0%
World of Tanks	270−280 +0%	270−280 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	80 +0%	80 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Far Cry 5	95−100 +0%	95−100 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	183 +0%	183 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	200−210 +0%	200−210 +0%
Valorant	205 +0%	205 +0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	90 +0%	90 +0%
Elden Ring	80−85 +0%	80−85 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	90 +0%	90 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	170−180 +0%	170−180 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	43 +0%	43 +0%
World of Tanks	250−260 +0%	250−260 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	78 +0%	78 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Far Cry 5	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	137 +0%	137 +0%
Metro Exodus	90 +0%	90 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
Valorant	162 +0%	162 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Dota 2	97 +0%	97 +0%
Elden Ring	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	97 +0%	97 +0%
Metro Exodus	35 +0%	35 +0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	120−130 +0%	120−130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	28 +0%	28 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	97 +0%	97 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	48 +0%	48 +0%
Counter-Strike 2	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%
Dota 2	141 +0%	141 +0%
Far Cry 5	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Fortnite	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	78 +0%	78 +0%
Valorant	89 +0%	89 +0%

This is how Quadro M2000 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 289% faster in 1080p
RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 292% faster in 1440p
RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 319% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	10.38	39.44
Recency	8 April 2016	2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	75 Watt	150 Watt

Quadro M2000 has 100% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 280% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 133.3% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro M2000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro M2000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.