UHD Graphics 770 vs Quadro K620

Place in performance ranking	563	549
Place by popularity	not in top-100	22
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	1.29	1.29
Architecture	Maxwell (2014−2018)	Alder Lake
GPU code name	GM107	Alder Lake xG
Market segment	Workstation	Desktop
Release date	22 July 2014 (9 years ago)	4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$189.89	no data
Current price	$286 (1.5x MSRP)	$878

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

Quadro K620 and UHD Graphics 770 have a nearly equal value for money.

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	32
Core clock speed	1058 MHz	no data
Boost clock speed	1124 MHz	300 MHz
Number of transistors	1,870 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	41 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	26.98	26.40
Floating-point performance	863.2 gflops	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	Ring Bus
Length	160 mm	no data
Width	1" (2.5 cm)	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	None	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	128 Bit	System Shared
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	System Shared
Memory bus width	128 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	1800 MHz	1550 MHz
Memory bandwidth	Up to 29 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	no data	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	DVI-I DP	No outputs
Number of simultaneous displays	4	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Desktop Management	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	5.0	no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K620 5.77

UHD Graphics 770 6.14
+6.4%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Quadro K620 by 6% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 25%

Quadro K620 2230

UHD Graphics 770 2761
+23.8%

UHD Graphics 770 outperforms Quadro K620 by 24% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	14−16 −21.4%	17 +21.4%
4K	12−14 −16.7%	14 +16.7%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

10−11

−20%

12
+20%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	12−14 −8.3%	13 +8.3%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Hitman 3	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	24−27 −12.5%	27 +12.5%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 −19%	25 +19%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Battlefield 5	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Far Cry New Dawn	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Hitman 3	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Metro Exodus	14−16 −7.1%	14−16 +7.1%
Red Dead Redemption 2	14−16 −21.4%	16−18 +21.4%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	16−18 −18.8%	19 +18.8%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	16−18 −12.5%	18 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −16.7%	14−16 +16.7%
Forza Horizon 4	27−30 −7.4%	27−30 +7.4%
Horizon Zero Dawn	10−11 −20%	12 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	14−16 −21.4%	17 +21.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −12.5%	9 +12.5%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 −19%	24−27 +19%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16

−21.4%

16−18
+21.4%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	10−11 −20%	12−14 +20%
Far Cry New Dawn	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	1−2
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	7−8 −14.3%	8−9 +14.3%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Far Cry 5	8−9 −12.5%	9−10 +12.5%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −10%	10−12 +10%
Hitman 3	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	12−14 −8.3%	12−14 +8.3%
Metro Exodus	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Watch Dogs: Legion	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

10−11

−10%

10−12
+10%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −25%	5−6 +25%
Far Cry New Dawn	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Hitman 3	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −33.3%	4−5 +33.3%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Far Cry 5	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Forza Horizon 4	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Horizon Zero Dawn	5−6 −20%	6−7 +20%
Metro Exodus	6−7 −16.7%	7−8 +16.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%