GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile vs Quadro K6000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K5200 Quadro K6000 Tesla K40d Tesla K40m Tesla K40s Tesla K40st Tesla K40t
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Super Max-Q RTX 2070 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K6000 with GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K6000
2013
12 GB GDDR5, 225 Watt
20.94

RTX 2070 Super Mobile outperforms K6000 by an impressive 75% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
RTX 2070 Super Mobile RTX 2070 Super

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking275137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.39no data
Power efficiency6.3821.79
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK110BTU104B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)2 April 2020 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$5,265 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores28802560
Core clock speed797 MHz1140 MHz
Boost clock speed902 MHz1380 MHz
Number of transistors7,080 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)225 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate216.5220.8
Floating-point processing power5.196 TFLOPS7.066 TFLOPS
ROPs4864
TMUs240160
Tensor Coresno data320
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 3.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount12 GB8 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1502 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth288.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA3.57.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD65−70
−86.2%
121
+86.2%
1440p40−45
−95%
78
+95%
4K24−27
−91.7%
46
+91.7%

Cost per frame, $

1080p81.00no data
1440p131.63no data
4K219.38no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Battlefield 5 166
+0%
166
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 164
+0%
164
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 100−105
+0%
100−105
+0%
Battlefield 5 152
+0%
152
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 130
+0%
130
+0%
Far Cry 5 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Fortnite 156
+0%
156
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 129
+0%
129
+0%
Metro Exodus 87
+0%
87
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 163
+0%
163
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 141
+0%
141
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Dota 2 124
+0%
124
+0%
Far Cry 5 105
+0%
105
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 87
+0%
87
+0%
Valorant 163
+0%
163
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 129
+0%
129
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 54
+0%
54
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 110
+0%
110
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 93
+0%
93
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 59
+0%
59
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 63
+0%
63
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Dota 2 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 48
+0%
48
+0%

This is how Quadro K6000 and RTX 2070 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 86% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 95% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Super Mobile is 92% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 20.94 36.56
Recency 23 July 2013 2 April 2020
Maximum RAM amount 12 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 225 Watt 115 Watt

Quadro K6000 has a 50% higher maximum VRAM amount.

RTX 2070 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 74.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 95.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K6000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K6000 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K6000
Quadro K6000
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro W6400 Radeon Pro W6400
RTX 2070 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile
vs
RX 6600M Radeon RX 6600M
Quadro K6000 Quadro K6000
vs
Pro 5500 XT Radeon Pro 5500 XT
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
9800 GT 9800 GT
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
P3000 Mobile P3000 Mobile
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
GTX 750 Ti OEM GTX 750 Ti OEM
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
ATI HD 2950 PRO HD 2950 PRO
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
Iris Plus Graphics Iris Plus Graphics
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile RTX 2050 Mobile
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 4090 Mobile RTX 4090 Mobile
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile Arc Graphics 48EU Mobile
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RTX 4070 GDDR6 RTX 4070 GDDR6

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

4 109 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 395 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K6000 or GeForce RTX 2070 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.