Quadro P620 vs Quadro K510M

Place in the ranking	946	468
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	3.84	16.37
Architecture	Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)	Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code name	GK208	GP107
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Workstation
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	1 February 2018 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	192	512
Core clock speed	846 MHz	1177 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1443 MHz
Number of transistors	915 million	3,300 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	40 Watt
Texture fill rate	13.54	46.18
Floating-point processing power	0.3249 TFLOPS	1.478 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	16
TMUs	16	32

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	no data	145 mm
Width	no data	IGP
Supplementary power connectors	no data	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Memory bus width	64 Bit	128 Bit
Memory clock speed	600 MHz	1502 MHz
Memory bandwidth	19.2 GB/s	96.13 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.2.131
CUDA	+	6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K510M 1.67

Quadro P620 9.49
+468%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K510M 641

Quadro P620 3650
+469%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

8−9

−500%

48
+500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Elden Ring	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −933%	30−35 +933%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −280%	35−40 +280%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −2400%	24−27 +2400%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −933%	30−35 +933%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Dota 2	3−4 −900%	30 +900%
Elden Ring	2−3 −1250%	27−30 +1250%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −433%	64 +433%
Fortnite	8−9 −600%	55−60 +600%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −280%	35−40 +280%
Grand Theft Auto V	3−4 −1033%	30−35 +1033%
Metro Exodus	1−2 −500%	6 +500%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −635%	125 +635%
Red Dead Redemption 2	7−8 −257%	24−27 +257%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	8−9 −263%	27−30 +263%
World of Tanks	30−35 −306%	130−140 +306%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	3−4 −933%	30−35 +933%
Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −100%	18−20 +100%
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 −350%	18−20 +350%
Dota 2	3−4 −2667%	83 +2667%
Far Cry 5	12−14 −225%	35−40 +225%
Forza Horizon 4	10−11 −280%	35−40 +280%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	16−18 −335%	70−75 +335%

1440p
High Preset

Elden Ring	0−1	12−14
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	10−12 −318%	45−50 +318%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
World of Tanks	10−11 −580%	65−70 +580%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	9−10 −11.1%	10−11 +11.1%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −250%	7−8 +250%
Far Cry 5	6−7 −233%	20−22 +233%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	3−4 −267%	10−12 +267%
Valorant	7−8 −243%	24−27 +243%

4K
High Preset

Dota 2	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Elden Ring	0−1	6−7
Grand Theft Auto V	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS	5−6 −460%	27−30 +460%
Red Dead Redemption 2	1−2 −500%	6−7 +500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14−16 −33.3%	20−22 +33.3%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −700%	8−9 +700%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Dota 2	16−18 −25%	20−22 +25%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −1000%	10−12 +1000%
Valorant	2−3 −350%	9−10 +350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Valorant

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Valorant

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Valorant

35−40

+0%

35−40

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%
Grand Theft Auto V	12−14 +0%	12−14 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5	18−20 +0%	18−20 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	20−22 +0%	20−22 +0%
Metro Exodus	16−18 +0%	16−18 +0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Metro Exodus	5−6 +0%	5−6 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Counter-Strike 2	4−5 +0%	4−5 +0%
Fortnite	10−11 +0%	10−11 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	10−12 +0%	10−12 +0%

This is how Quadro K510M and Quadro P620 compete in popular games:

Quadro P620 is 500% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Dota 2, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the Quadro P620 is 2667% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Quadro P620 is ahead in 48 tests (79%)
there's a draw in 13 tests (21%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	1.67	9.49
Recency	23 July 2013	1 February 2018
Maximum RAM amount	1 GB	2 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	30 Watt	40 Watt

Quadro K510M has 33.3% lower power consumption.

Quadro P620, on the other hand, has a 468.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro P620 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation card while Quadro P620 is a workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.