GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile vs Quadro K510M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K510M with GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K510M
2013
1 GB GDDR5, 30 Watt
1.66

RTX 4090 Mobile outperforms K510M by a whopping 4244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking94717
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208AD103
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)3 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1929728
Core clock speed846 MHz1335 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors915 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate13.54515.3
Floating-point processing power0.3249 TFLOPS32.98 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedlarge
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz2250 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/s576.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+1.3
CUDA+8.9

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K510M 1.66
RTX 4090 Mobile 72.11
+4244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K510M 641
RTX 4090 Mobile 27813
+4239%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−4350%
178
+4350%
1440p3−4
−4300%
132
+4300%
4K1−2
−8400%
85
+8400%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3800%
156
+3800%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3450%
142
+3450%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5200%
100−110
+5200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3200%
130−140
+3200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2700%
168
+2700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1213%
210−220
+1213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−2300%
210−220
+2300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−326%
140−150
+326%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3300%
136
+3300%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5200%
100−110
+5200%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−3200%
130−140
+3200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2683%
167
+2683%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1213%
210−220
+1213%
Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−4200%
387
+4200%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−842%
110−120
+842%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−326%
140−150
+326%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−1800%
110−120
+1800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 5−6
−2000%
100−110
+2000%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
−3025%
125
+3025%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−5200%
100−110
+5200%
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−4300%
220−230
+4300%
Hitman 3 6−7
−2433%
152
+2433%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
−1806%
305
+1806%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10
−4011%
370
+4011%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 12−14
−1600%
204
+1600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−253%
120
+253%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−3600%
110−120
+3600%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−5600%
110−120
+5600%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−4150%
85−90
+4150%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−6100%
60−65
+6100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−6400%
65−70
+6400%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−9400%
95
+9400%
Far Cry 5 2−3
−3100%
60−65
+3100%
Hitman 3 7−8
−1871%
138
+1871%
Horizon Zero Dawn 5−6
−4960%
253
+4960%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−16300%
164
+16300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 9−10
−2400%
220−230
+2400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−2250%
90−95
+2250%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 1−2
−4900%
50−55
+4900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−1950%
40−45
+1950%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−7700%
78
+7700%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 35−40
Far Cry 5 1−2
−3400%
35−40
+3400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 0−1 69

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−1667%
50−55
+1667%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 187
+0%
187
+0%
Battlefield 5 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Metro Exodus 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 161
+0%
161
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 128
+0%
128
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 260−270
+0%
260−270
+0%
Metro Exodus 128
+0%
128
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 294
+0%
294
+0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Hitman 3 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 65
+0%
65
+0%
Metro Exodus 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 150
+0%
150
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 48
+0%
48
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 156
+0%
156
+0%

This is how Quadro K510M and RTX 4090 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 4350% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 4300% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4090 Mobile is 8400% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX 4090 Mobile is 16300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX 4090 Mobile is ahead in 51 test (73%)
  • there's a draw in 19 tests (27%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.66 72.11
Recency 23 July 2013 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 16 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 120 Watt

Quadro K510M has 300% lower power consumption.

RTX 4090 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 4244% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 600% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K510M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K510M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K510M
Quadro K510M
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K510M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 594 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.