NVS 3100M vs Quadro K5100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K5100M and NVS 3100M, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

K5100M
2013
8 GB GDDR5, 100 Watt
8.28
+1462%

K5100M outperforms NVS 3100M by a whopping 1462% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking5061226
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency5.672.59
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK104GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationMobile workstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)7 January 2010 (14 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores153616
Core clock speed771 MHz606 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate98.694.848
Floating-point processing power2.369 TFLOPS0.04698 TFLOPS
ROPs324
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
InterfaceMXM-B (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount8 GB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz790 MHz
Memory bandwidth115.2 GB/s12.64 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.3
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+1.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5100M 8.28
+1462%
NVS 3100M 0.53

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5100M 3190
+1464%
NVS 3100M 204

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K5100M 24795
+2113%
NVS 3100M 1121

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD51
+1600%
3−4
−1600%
4K26
+2500%
1−2
−2500%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Hitman 3 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Battlefield 5 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Far Cry New Dawn 21−24
+2200%
1−2
−2200%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Hitman 3 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Metro Exodus 24−27
+2300%
1−2
−2300%
Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 82
+720%
10−11
−720%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 10−12 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 16−18
+433%
3−4
−433%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Far Cry 5 18−20
+1700%
1−2
−1700%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+1667%
3−4
−1667%
Hitman 3 14−16
+200%
5−6
−200%
Horizon Zero Dawn 45−50
+360%
10−11
−360%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 27−30
+350%
6−7
−350%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14
+40%
10−11
−40%
Watch Dogs: Legion 55−60
+90%
30−33
−90%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 21−24
+2100%
1−2
−2100%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+1500%
1−2
−1500%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+1100%
1−2
−1100%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 8−9 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+300%
1−2
−300%
Far Cry 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Forza Horizon 4 30−35
+3000%
1−2
−3000%
Hitman 3 10−12
+83.3%
6−7
−83.3%
Horizon Zero Dawn 16−18
+467%
3−4
−467%
Metro Exodus 10−11 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 7−8 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7−8 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 50−55
+5000%
1−2
−5000%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+367%
3−4
−367%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 7−8 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 6−7 0−1
Hitman 3 4−5 0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30
+2800%
1−2
−2800%
Metro Exodus 6−7 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 9−10 0−1
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 8−9
+300%
2−3
−300%

This is how K5100M and NVS 3100M compete in popular games:

  • K5100M is 1600% faster in 1080p
  • K5100M is 2500% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Watch Dogs: Legion, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K5100M is 5000% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Without exception, K5100M surpassed NVS 3100M in all 35 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 8.28 0.53
Recency 23 July 2013 7 January 2010
Maximum RAM amount 8 GB 512 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 14 Watt

K5100M has a 1462.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

NVS 3100M, on the other hand, has 614.3% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5100M is our recommended choice as it beats the NVS 3100M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5100M
Quadro K5100M
NVIDIA NVS 3100M
NVS 3100M

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 50 votes

Rate Quadro K5100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 128 votes

Rate NVS 3100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.