HD Graphics 510 vs Quadro K5100M

Place in the ranking	508	957
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	5.72	7.48
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Generation 9.0 (2015−2016)
GPU code name	GK104	Skylake GT1
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	23 July 2013 (11 years ago)	1 September 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1536	96
Core clock speed	771 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	900 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	189 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	14 nm+
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt
Texture fill rate	98.69	10.80
Floating-point processing power	2.369 TFLOPS	0.1728 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	3
TMUs	128	12

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	large	no data
Interface	MXM-B (3.0)	Ring Bus

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	LPDDR3/DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	System Shared
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	System Shared
Memory bandwidth	115.2 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	Portable Device Dependent
Display Port	1.2	no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
3D Vision Pro	+	no data
Mosaic	+	no data
nView Display Management	+	no data
Optimus	+	no data
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.5	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	3.0
Vulkan	+	1.3
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K5100M 8.20
+409%

HD Graphics 510 1.61

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K5100M 3162
+408%

HD Graphics 510 622

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K5100M 6880
+712%

HD Graphics 510 847

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K5100M 24795
+553%

HD Graphics 510 3798

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K5100M 4793
+672%

HD Graphics 510 621

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K5100M 31015
+448%

HD Graphics 510 5664

3DMark Ice Storm GPU

Ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to measure entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets performance. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two space fleets near a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is now superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.

K5100M 2197

HD Graphics 510 43274
+1870%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	50 +456%	9−10 −456%
4K	27 +440%	5−6 −440%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

12−14
+225%

4−5

−225%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Hitman 3	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +207%	14−16 −207%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +72.7%	30−35 −72.7%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Battlefield 5	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Far Cry New Dawn	21−24 +667%	3−4 −667%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Hitman 3	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +207%	14−16 −207%
Metro Exodus	24−27 +500%	4−5 −500%
Red Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +1000%	2−3 −1000%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	82 +645%	10−12 −645%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +72.7%	30−35 −72.7%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	20−22 +233%	6−7 −233%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	10−12 +450%	2−3 −450%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	16−18 +300%	4−5 −300%
Cyberpunk 2077	12−14 +225%	4−5 −225%
Far Cry 5	18−20 +800%	2−3 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	50−55 +1667%	3−4 −1667%
Hitman 3	14−16 +150%	6−7 −150%
Horizon Zero Dawn	45−50 +207%	14−16 −207%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27−30 +238%	8−9 −238%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	14 +27.3%	10−12 −27.3%
Watch Dogs: Legion	55−60 +72.7%	30−35 −72.7%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

21−24
+1000%

2−3

−1000%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	16−18 +1500%	1−2 −1500%
Far Cry New Dawn	12−14 +500%	2−3 −500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 +700%	1−2 −700%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	4−5	0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	8−9	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	4−5 +300%	1−2 −300%
Far Cry 5	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Forza Horizon 4	30−35 +417%	6−7 −417%
Hitman 3	10−12 +57.1%	7−8 −57.1%
Horizon Zero Dawn	16−18 +240%	5−6 −240%
Metro Exodus	10−11 +900%	1−2 −900%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	50−55 +629%	7−8 −629%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

14−16
+250%

4−5

−250%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	7−8 +600%	1−2 −600%
Far Cry New Dawn	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
Hitman 3	4−5	0−1
Horizon Zero Dawn	27−30 +480%	5−6 −480%
Metro Exodus	6−7 +500%	1−2 −500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	10 +900%	1−2 −900%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	5−6 +400%	1−2 −400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	3−4 +200%	1−2 −200%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	4−5	0−1
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2	0−1
Far Cry 5	4−5	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	9−10 +800%	1−2 −800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	3−4	0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion	3−4	0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

8−9
+167%

3−4

−167%

This is how K5100M and HD Graphics 510 compete in popular games:

K5100M is 456% faster in 1080p
K5100M is 440% faster in 4K

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the K5100M is 1667% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

Without exception, K5100M surpassed HD Graphics 510 in all 49 of our tests.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	8.20	1.61
Recency	23 July 2013	1 September 2015
Maximum RAM amount	8 GB	32 GB
Chip lithography	28 nm	14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	100 Watt	15 Watt

K5100M has a 409.3% higher aggregate performance score.

HD Graphics 510, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 566.7% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K5100M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics 510 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K5100M is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics 510 is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.