GRID M60-2Q vs Quadro K500M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K500M with GRID M60-2Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K500M
2012
1 GB DDR3, 35 Watt
1.24

GRID M60-2Q outperforms K500M by a whopping 988% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1035379
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.474.18
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameGK107GM204
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date1 June 2012 (12 years ago)30 August 2015 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1922048
Core clock speed850 MHz557 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1178 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate13.60150.8
Floating-point processing power0.3264 TFLOPS4.825 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs16128

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB2 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s160.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.1.126
CUDA+5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K500M 1.24
GRID M60-2Q 13.49
+988%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K500M 480
GRID M60-2Q 5203
+984%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Hitman 3 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Hitman 3 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
Cyberpunk 2077 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%
Hitman 3 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%
Horizon Zero Dawn 14−16
−971%
150−160
+971%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 8−9
−963%
85−90
+963%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 10−12
−900%
110−120
+900%
Watch Dogs: Legion 30−35
−961%
350−400
+961%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−950%
21−24
+950%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Hitman 3 7−8
−971%
75−80
+971%
Horizon Zero Dawn 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 0−1 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 6−7
−983%
65−70
+983%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−900%
40−45
+900%

4K
High Preset

Far Cry New Dawn 0−1 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−900%
10−11
+900%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 3−4
−900%
30−33
+900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.24 13.49
Recency 1 June 2012 30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 2 GB
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 225 Watt

Quadro K500M has 542.9% lower power consumption.

GRID M60-2Q, on the other hand, has a 987.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

The GRID M60-2Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K500M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K500M is a mobile workstation card while GRID M60-2Q is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K500M
Quadro K500M
NVIDIA GRID M60-2Q
GRID M60-2Q

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro K500M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 3 votes

Rate GRID M60-2Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.