ATI Radeon 9800 PRO vs Quadro K5000 SYNC

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Rage 8 (2002−2007)
GPU code nameGK104R350
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date25 January 2013 (11 years ago)1 March 2003 (21 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,299 $399

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1536no data
Core clock speed706 MHz380 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million117 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm150 nm
Power consumption (TDP)122 Watt47 Watt
Texture fill rate90.373.040
Floating-point processing power2.169 TFLOPSno data
ROPs328
TMUs1288

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16AGP 8x
Length267 mmno data
Width3-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin1x Molex

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR
Maximum RAM amount4 GB128 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz340 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s21.76 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x SDI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)9.0 (9_0)
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.62.0
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 January 2013 1 March 2003
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 128 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 150 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 122 Watt 47 Watt

K5000 SYNC has an age advantage of 9 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 435.7% more advanced lithography process.

ATI 9800 PRO, on the other hand, has 159.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K5000 SYNC and Radeon 9800 PRO. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K5000 SYNC is a workstation graphics card while Radeon 9800 PRO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K5000 SYNC
Quadro K5000 SYNC
ATI Radeon 9800 PRO
Radeon 9800 PRO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.1 25 votes

Rate Quadro K5000 SYNC on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 58 votes

Rate Radeon 9800 PRO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.