Tesla M6 vs Quadro K4200

Place in the ranking	418	330
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	2.10	no data
Power efficiency	7.24	11.35
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Maxwell 2.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code name	GK104	GM204
Market segment	Workstation	Workstation
Release date	22 July 2014 (10 years ago)	30 August 2015 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$854.99	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	1344	1536
Core clock speed	771 MHz	930 MHz
Boost clock speed	784 MHz	1180 MHz
Number of transistors	3,540 million	5,200 million
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	100 Watt
Texture fill rate	87.81	113.3
Floating-point processing power	2.107 TFLOPS	3.625 TFLOPS
ROPs	32	64
TMUs	112	96

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface	PCIe 2.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16
Length	241 mm	no data
Width	1-slot	MXM Module
Supplementary power connectors	1x 6-pin	None

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Memory bus width	256 Bit	256 Bit
Memory clock speed	1350 MHz	1253 MHz
Memory bandwidth	172.8 GB/s	160.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

No outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12 (12_1)
Shader Model	5.1	6.4
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
OpenCL	1.2	1.2
Vulkan	+	1.1.126
CUDA	3.0	5.2

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K4200 11.22

Tesla M6 16.29
+45.2%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4200 4327

Tesla M6 6284
+45.2%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	11.22	16.29
Recency	22 July 2014	30 August 2015
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	8 GB
Power consumption (TDP)	108 Watt	100 Watt

Tesla M6 has a 45.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and 8% lower power consumption.

The Tesla M6 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4200 in performance tests.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.