GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q vs Quadro K4200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GRID K2 GRID K220Q GRID K240Q GRID K260Q GRID K280Q GRID K520 Quadro 4100 Quadro K4200 Quadro K5000 Quadro K5000 Mac Edition Tesla K8 Tesla K10
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
RTX 2060 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2060 Mobile Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q Refresh RTX 2070 Mobile Refresh

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4200 with GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4200
2014
4 GB GDDR5, 108 Watt
11.28

RTX 2070 Max-Q outperforms K4200 by a whopping 167% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
RTX 2070 Max-Q RTX 2070 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking430199
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.48no data
Power efficiency7.1625.79
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK104TU106B
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)29 January 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$854.99 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores13442304
Core clock speed771 MHz885 MHz
Boost clock speed784 MHz1185 MHz
Number of transistors3,540 million10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)108 Watt80 Watt
Texture fill rate87.81170.6
Floating-point processing power2.107 TFLOPS5.46 TFLOPS
ROPs3264
TMUs112144
Tensor Coresno data288
Ray Tracing Coresno data36

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount4 GB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1350 MHz1500 MHz
Memory bandwidth172.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA3.07.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

Quadro K4200 11.28
RTX 2070 Max-Q 30.09
+167%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4200 4335
RTX 2070 Max-Q 11566
+167%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD35−40
−186%
100
+186%
1440p21−24
−186%
60
+186%
4K14−16
−179%
39
+179%

Cost per frame, $

1080p24.43no data
1440p40.71no data
4K61.07no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Battlefield 5 92
+0%
92
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 122
+0%
122
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 121
+0%
121
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 148
+0%
148
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Atomic Heart 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Battlefield 5 88
+0%
88
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 127
+0%
127
+0%
Far Cry 5 95
+0%
95
+0%
Fortnite 115
+0%
115
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 118
+0%
118
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 61
+0%
61
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 128
+0%
128
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 122
+0%
122
+0%
Valorant 180−190
+0%
180−190
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 89
+0%
89
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
Dota 2 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 90
+0%
90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 98
+0%
98
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 93
+0%
93
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 64
+0%
64
+0%
Valorant 129
+0%
129
+0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Fortnite 100
+0%
100
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Metro Exodus 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 75
+0%
75
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 66
+0%
66
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
Epic Preset

Fortnite 76
+0%
76
+0%

4K
High Preset

Atomic Heart 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 69
+0%
69
+0%
Metro Exodus 22
+0%
22
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 160−170
+0%
160−170
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 42
+0%
42
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 93
+0%
93
+0%
Far Cry 5 33
+0%
33
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Forza Horizon 5 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 36
+0%
36
+0%

4K
Epic Preset

Fortnite 32
+0%
32
+0%

This is how Quadro K4200 and RTX 2070 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 186% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 186% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 2070 Max-Q is 179% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 67 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 11.28 30.09
Recency 22 July 2014 29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 8 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 108 Watt 80 Watt

RTX 2070 Max-Q has a 166.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 35% lower power consumption.

The GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4200 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4200 is a workstation card while GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4200
Quadro K4200
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
Tesla K20Xm Tesla K20Xm
RTX 2070 Max-Q GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q
vs
RTX 2060 Mobile GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
Quadro K4200 Quadro K4200
vs
FirePro W7000 FirePro W7000
Tesla M40 Tesla M40
vs
H100 PCIe 80 GB H100 PCIe 80 GB
Quadro M4000 M4000
vs
RX 7600M XT RX 7600M XT
Quadro M5000 M5000
vs
HD Graphics 530 HD Graphics 530
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
R7 M360 R7 M360
Quadro K2200 K2200
vs
GTX 850A GTX 850A
Quadro K6000 K6000
vs
RX 7500 XT RX 7500 XT
GRID K280Q GRID K280Q
vs
UHD Graphics 770 UHD Graphics 770
Quadro K600 K600
vs
R7 435 OEM R7 435 OEM
K5000 SYNC K5000 SYNC
vs
T400 T400
Tesla M2070 Tesla M2070
vs
RX 5700 RX 5700

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.7 164 votes

Rate Quadro K4200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 360 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K4200 or GeForce RTX 2070 Max-Q, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.