ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700 vs Quadro K4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking549not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.55no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)RV6xx (2007−2010)
GPU code nameGK106M76-XT
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)12 December 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores768120
Core clock speed810 MHz700 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million390 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rate51.845.600
Floating-point performance1.244 gflops0.168 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16MXM-II
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5DDR2, GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount3 GB256+ MB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed5616 MHz700 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 12 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 256+ MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 35 Watt

Quadro K4000 has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

ATI Mobility HD 2700, on the other hand, has 128.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K4000 and Mobility Radeon HD 2700. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation card while Mobility Radeon HD 2700 is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 2700
Mobility Radeon HD 2700

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 186 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 5 votes

Rate Mobility Radeon HD 2700 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.