GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q vs Quadro K4000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
Quadro K2000 Quadro K2200 Quadro K4000 Quadro K4200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
GTX 1650 Mobile GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Mobile Refresh GTX 1650 Ti Max-Q GTX 1650 Ti Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K4000 with GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q, including specs and performance data.

Quadro K4000
2013
3 GB GDDR5, 80 Watt
7.08

GTX 1650 Max-Q outperforms K4000 by a whopping 128% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
GTX 1650 Max-Q GTX 1650 Max-Q

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking551335
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.60no data
Power efficiency6.0937.01
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameGK106TU117
Market segmentWorkstationLaptop
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)23 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,269 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores7681024
Core clock speed810 MHz930 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1125 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,700 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate51.8472.00
Floating-point processing power1.244 TFLOPS2.304 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs6464

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datamedium sized
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length241 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount3 GB4 GB
Memory bus width192 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed1404 MHz1751 MHz
Memory bandwidth134.8 GB/s112.1 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.5
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.140
CUDA3.07.5

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Quadro K4000 7.08
GTX 1650 Max-Q 16.13
+128%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Quadro K4000 2722
GTX 1650 Max-Q 6200
+128%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD24−27
−146%
59
+146%
1440p12−14
−142%
29
+142%
4K7−8
−157%
18
+157%

Cost per frame, $

1080p52.88no data
1440p105.75no data
4K181.29no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Battlefield 5 53
+0%
53
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Metro Exodus 52
+0%
52
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 54
+0%
54
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

Full HD
High Preset

Battlefield 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 69
+0%
69
+0%
Elden Ring 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Far Cry 5 52
+0%
52
+0%
Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 56
+0%
56
+0%
Metro Exodus 36
+0%
36
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 118
+0%
118
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 23
+0%
23
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Valorant 35
+0%
35
+0%
World of Tanks 167
+0%
167
+0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 44
+0%
44
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Dota 2 88
+0%
88
+0%
Far Cry 5 59
+0%
59
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Valorant 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Dota 2 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Elden Ring 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 24−27
+0%
24−27
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
World of Tanks 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 29
+0%
29
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Far Cry 5 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Metro Exodus 32
+0%
32
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
High Preset

Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Elden Ring 10−12
+0%
10−12
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Metro Exodus 10
+0%
10
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 43
+0%
43
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 10−11
+0%
10−11
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 14
+0%
14
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 4−5
+0%
4−5
+0%
Dota 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Far Cry 5 20−22
+0%
20−22
+0%
Fortnite 19
+0%
19
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Valorant 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%

This is how Quadro K4000 and GTX 1650 Max-Q compete in popular games:

  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 146% faster in 1080p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 142% faster in 1440p
  • GTX 1650 Max-Q is 157% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 7.08 16.13
Recency 1 March 2013 23 April 2019
Maximum RAM amount 3 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 30 Watt

GTX 1650 Max-Q has a 127.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 33.3% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 133.3% more advanced lithography process, and 166.7% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K4000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K4000 is a workstation card while GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q is a notebook one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.

NVIDIA Quadro K4000
Quadro K4000
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
Like
Like

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
GRID K2 GRID K2
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
HD 7970M Crossfire Radeon HD 7970M Crossfire
Quadro K4000 Quadro K4000
vs
Quadro 6000 Quadro 6000
UHD Graphics 730 UHD Graphics 730
vs
T600 Mobile Quadro T600 Mobile
GTX 760 OEM GeForce GTX 760 OEM
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
GTX 1650 Max-Q GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
vs
RX 7600M Radeon RX 7600M
FirePro W7100 FirePro W7100
vs
RTX 3090 GeForce RTX 3090
R7 Graphics Radeon R7 Graphics
vs
RX 7900 XTX Radeon RX 7900 XTX
UHD Graphics 620 UHD Graphics 620
vs
T500 Max-Q T500 Max Q
GTX 1060 3 GB GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
vs
HD Graphics 2000 HD Graphics 2000
RX Vega 3 Radeon RX Vega 3
vs
RTX 2070 GeForce RTX 2070
HD 7850 Radeon HD 7850
vs
ATI HD 4650 Radeon HD 4650
GT 750M SLI GeForce GT 750M SLI
vs
RTX 2050 Mobile GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

3.3 197 votes

Rate Quadro K4000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 642 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.