Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm vs Quadro K2200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking469not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.08no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2018)no data
GPU code nameGM107RE+SE-65nm
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)30 August 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 $249

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640no data
Core clock speed1046 MHz133 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt4 Watt
Texture fill rate44.960.67
Floating-point processing power1.439 gflopsno data
ROPs165
TMUs405

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data
Length202 mm169 mm
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5eDRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed5012 MHz83 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s5.312 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 30 August 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 28 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 4 Watt

Quadro K2200 has an age advantage of 6 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 132.1% more advanced lithography process.

Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm, on the other hand, has 1600% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200 and Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro K2200 is a workstation graphics card while Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm
Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 401 vote

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Sony Playstation Portable GPU 65nm on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.