ATI FireGL V8600 vs Quadro K2200

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking474not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation3.15no data
Power efficiency9.44no data
ArchitectureMaxwell (2014−2017)TeraScale (2005−2013)
GPU code nameGM107R600
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (10 years ago)14 May 2007 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$395.75 $1,899

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores640320
Core clock speed1046 MHz688 MHz
Boost clock speed1124 MHzno data
Number of transistors1,870 million720 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)68 Watt159 Watt
Texture fill rate44.9611.01
Floating-point processing power1.439 TFLOPS0.4403 TFLOPS
ROPs1616
TMUs4016

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length202 mm254 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR4
Maximum RAM amount4 GB1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed1253 MHz868 MHz
Memory bandwidth80.19 GB/s111.1 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPort1x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)10.0 (10_0)
Shader Model5.14.0
OpenGL4.63.3
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA5.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 14 May 2007
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 68 Watt 159 Watt

Quadro K2200 has an age advantage of 7 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 185.7% more advanced lithography process, and 133.8% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2200 and FireGL V8600. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2200
Quadro K2200
ATI FireGL V8600
FireGL V8600

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 415 votes

Rate Quadro K2200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate FireGL V8600 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.