P106-100 vs Quadro K2100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2100M with P106-100, including specs and performance data.

K2100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.51

P106-100 outperforms K2100M by a whopping 373% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking718322
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Power efficiency4.619.99
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameGK106GP106
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)19 June 2017 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5761280
Core clock speed667 MHz1506 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1709 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million4,400 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Watt120 Watt
Texture fill rate32.02136.7
Floating-point processing power0.7684 TFLOPS4.375 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs4880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data250 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed752 MHz2002 MHz
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/s192.2 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212 (12_1)
Shader Model5.16.4
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.21.2
Vulkan+1.2.131
CUDA+6.1

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.51
P106-100 16.60
+373%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2100M 1356
P106-100 6408
+373%

GeekBench 5 OpenCL

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Group.

K2100M 4518
P106-100 36344
+704%

GeekBench 5 Vulkan

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

K2100M 4104
P106-100 32907
+702%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
−335%
100−110
+335%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Battlefield 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Metro Exodus 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
−340%
110−120
+340%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
−350%
45−50
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry 5 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
−350%
90−95
+350%
Hitman 3 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
−340%
110−120
+340%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
−364%
65−70
+364%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
−367%
70−75
+367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
−363%
190−200
+363%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
−350%
27−30
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
−320%
21−24
+320%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry 5 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Hitman 3 8−9
−338%
35−40
+338%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
−344%
40−45
+344%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4
−367%
14−16
+367%
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
−355%
100−105
+355%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−329%
30−33
+329%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3
−350%
9−10
+350%
Forza Horizon 4 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−300%
4−5
+300%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−350%
18−20
+350%

This is how K2100M and P106-100 compete in popular games:

  • P106-100 is 335% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.51 16.60
Recency 23 July 2013 19 June 2017
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 55 Watt 120 Watt

K2100M has 118.2% lower power consumption.

P106-100, on the other hand, has a 372.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, a 200% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The P106-100 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while P106-100 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
NVIDIA P106-100
P106-100

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 278 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 167 votes

Rate P106-100 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.