HD Graphics P3000 vs Quadro K2100M

VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K2100M with HD Graphics P3000, including specs and performance data.

K2100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 55 Watt
3.53
+377%

K2100M outperforms HD Graphics P3000 by a whopping 377% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking7251162
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.63no data
Power efficiency4.40no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Generation 6.0 (2011)
GPU code nameGK106Sandy Bridge GT2
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)1 February 2011 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$84.95 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores57696
Core clock speed667 MHz850 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1350 MHz
Number of transistors2,540 million995 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm32 nm
Power consumption (TDP)55 Wattno data
Texture fill rate32.0216.20
Floating-point processing power0.7684 TFLOPS0.2592 TFLOPS
ROPs162
TMUs4812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 1.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5System Shared
Maximum RAM amount2 GBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed752 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth48.0 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.53.1
OpenCL1.2N/A
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2100M 3.53
+377%
HD Graphics P3000 0.74

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K2100M 1360
+379%
HD Graphics P3000 284

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD23
+475%
4−5
−475%

Cost per frame, $

1080p3.69no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Battlefield 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Far Cry New Dawn 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Metro Exodus 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25
+400%
5−6
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 10−11
+400%
2−3
−400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 2−3 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%
Forza Horizon 4 20−22
+400%
4−5
−400%
Hitman 3 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Horizon Zero Dawn 24−27
+400%
5−6
−400%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 14−16
+600%
2−3
−600%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14−16
+400%
3−4
−400%
Watch Dogs: Legion 40−45
+413%
8−9
−413%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry New Dawn 5−6
+400%
1−2
−400%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 3−4 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 3−4 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Hitman 3 8−9
+700%
1−2
−700%
Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 3−4 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 21−24
+450%
4−5
−450%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
+600%
1−2
−600%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 2−3 0−1
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3 0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3 0−1
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2 0−1
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Far Cry 5 2−3 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 1−2 0−1
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2 0−1

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5 0−1

This is how K2100M and HD Graphics P3000 compete in popular games:

  • K2100M is 475% faster in 1080p

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.53 0.74
Recency 23 July 2013 1 February 2011
Chip lithography 28 nm 32 nm

K2100M has a 377% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and a 14.3% more advanced lithography process.

The Quadro K2100M is our recommended choice as it beats the HD Graphics P3000 in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2100M is a mobile workstation card while HD Graphics P3000 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2100M
Quadro K2100M
Intel HD Graphics P3000
HD Graphics P3000

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 280 votes

Rate Quadro K2100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 51 vote

Rate HD Graphics P3000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.