Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) vs Quadro K2000M

Place in the ranking	812	689
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation	0.30	no data
Power efficiency	3.30	11.24
Architecture	Kepler (2012−2018)	Gen. 11 Ice Lake (2019−2022)
GPU code name	GK107	Ice Lake G4 Gen. 11
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2012 (12 years ago)	28 May 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)	$265.27	no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	384	48
Core clock speed	745 MHz	300 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1100 MHz
Number of transistors	1,270 million	no data
Manufacturing process technology	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	12-25 Watt
Texture fill rate	23.84	no data
Floating-point processing power	0.5722 TFLOPS	no data
ROPs	16	no data
TMUs	32	no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	no data
Interface	MXM-A (3.0)	no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	DDR3	DDR4
Maximum RAM amount	2 GB	no data
Memory bus width	128 Bit	no data
Memory clock speed	900 MHz	no data
Memory bandwidth	28.8 GB/s	no data
Shared memory	-	+

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors

No outputs

no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus	+	-
Quick Sync	no data	+

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	12 (11_0)	12_1
Shader Model	5.1	no data
OpenGL	4.6	no data
OpenCL	1.2	no data
Vulkan	+	-
CUDA	+	-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.

Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K2000M 2.62

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 4.06
+55%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K2000M 1798

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 3225
+79.4%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K2000M 7947

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 8812
+10.9%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K2000M 1046

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 2124
+103%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K2000M 8766

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 14910
+70.1%

Unigine Heaven 3.0

This is an old DirectX 11 benchmark using Unigine, a 3D game engine by eponymous Russian company. It displays a fantasy medieval town sprawling over several flying islands. Version 3.0 was released in 2012, and in 2013 it was superseded by Heaven 4.0, which introduced several slight improvements, including a newer version of Unigine.

K2000M 17

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) 31
+79.4%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD

24
+50%

−50%

Cost per frame, $

1080p

11.05

no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

5−6

−40%

7−8
+40%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −37.5%	11 +37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Battlefield 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −50%	9 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −850%	19 +850%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −66.7%	10 +66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −13.2%	40−45 +13.2%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Battlefield 5	4−5 −125%	9−10 +125%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Far Cry New Dawn	7−8 −57.1%	10−12 +57.1%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Metro Exodus	2−3 −600%	14 +600%
Red Dead Redemption 2	6−7 −66.7%	10−11 +66.7%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 −23.1%	16−18 +23.1%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −13.2%	40−45 +13.2%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	8−9 −37.5%	10−12 +37.5%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	3−4
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	6−7 −50%	9−10 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	5−6 −40%	7−8 +40%
Far Cry 5	5−6 −60%	8−9 +60%
Forza Horizon 4	12−14 −84.6%	24−27 +84.6%
Hitman 3	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 −28.6%	27−30 +28.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	10−12 −36.4%	14−16 +36.4%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	12−14 +85.7%	7 −85.7%
Watch Dogs: Legion	35−40 −13.2%	40−45 +13.2%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−66.7%

10−11
+66.7%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	4−5 −75%	7−8 +75%
Far Cry New Dawn	4−5 −50%	6−7 +50%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −100%	4−5 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Cyberpunk 2077	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry 5	3−4 −66.7%	5−6 +66.7%
Hitman 3	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	7−8 −28.6%	9−10 +28.6%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Watch Dogs: Legion	14−16 −66.7%	24−27 +66.7%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

6−7

−33.3%

8−9
+33.3%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Far Cry New Dawn	1−2 −200%	3−4 +200%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	2−3 −50%	3−4 +50%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	1−2 +0%	1−2 +0%
Far Cry 5	1−2 −100%	2−3 +100%
Watch Dogs: Legion	0−1	1−2

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

4−5

−25%

5−6
+25%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Forza Horizon 4

5−6

+0%

5−6

+0%

4K
High Preset

Hitman 3	0−1	0−1
Metro Exodus	0−1	0−1

4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	0−1
Forza Horizon 4	2−3 +0%	2−3 +0%

This is how K2000M and Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) compete in popular games:

K2000M is 50% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt, with 1080p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the K2000M is 86% faster.
in Metro Exodus, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is 850% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

K2000M is ahead in 1 test (2%)
Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is ahead in 54 tests (92%)
there's a draw in 4 tests (7%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	2.62	4.06
Recency	1 June 2012	28 May 2019
Chip lithography	28 nm	10 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	55 Watt	12 Watt

Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) has a 55% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 358.3% lower power consumption.

The Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K2000M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K2000M is a mobile workstation card while Iris Plus Graphics G4 (Ice Lake 48 EU) is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.