Radeon Instinct MI250X vs Quadro K2000

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking689not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.37no data
Power efficiency5.90no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)CDNA 2.0 (2021)
GPU code nameGK107Aldebaran
Market segmentWorkstationWorkstation
Release date1 March 2013 (11 years ago)8 November 2021 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38414080
Core clock speed954 MHz1000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1700 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million58,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)51 Watt500 Watt
Texture fill rate30.531,496
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS47.87 TFLOPS
ROPs16no data
TMUs32880

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length202 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5HBM2e
Maximum RAM amount2 GB128 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit8192 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1600 MHz
Memory bandwidth64 GB/s3,277 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 2x DisplayPortNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)N/A
Shader Model5.1N/A
OpenGL4.6N/A
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA3.0-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 March 2013 8 November 2021
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 128 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 51 Watt 500 Watt

Quadro K2000 has 880.4% lower power consumption.

Instinct MI250X, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro K2000 and Radeon Instinct MI250X. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K2000
Quadro K2000
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250X
Radeon Instinct MI250X

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 192 votes

Rate Quadro K2000 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 123 votes

Rate Radeon Instinct MI250X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.