GeForce G210M vs Quadro K1100M

#ad 
Buy
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M with GeForce G210M, including specs and performance data.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.43
+738%

K1100M outperforms G210M by a whopping 738% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking8071319
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.08no data
Power efficiency4.301.65
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameGK107GT218
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)15 June 2009 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the performance-to-price ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices for comparison.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores38416
Core clock speed706 MHz625 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt14 Watt
Texture fill rate22.595.000
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPS0.048 TFLOPS
Gigaflopsno data72
ROPs164
TMUs328

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
Bus supportno dataPCI-E 2.0
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 2.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount2 GBUp to 1 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed700 MHzUp to 500 (DDR2), Up to 800 (DDR3), Up to 800 (GDDR3) MHz
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/s12.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsDual Link DVIDisplayPortHDMISingle Link DVIVGA
Multi monitor supportno data+
HDMI-+
Maximum VGA resolutionno data2048x1536
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
Power managementno data8.0
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API and SDK compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1211.1 (10_1)
Shader Model5.14.1
OpenGL4.52.1
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan+N/A
CUDA++

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

K1100M 2.43
+738%
GeForce G210M 0.29

  • Other tests
    • Passmark
    • 3DMark Vantage Performance
    • 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

K1100M 1086
+748%
GeForce G210M 128

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1100M 8992
+781%
GeForce G210M 1021

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K1100M 9228
+411%
GeForce G210M 1805

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD18
+12.5%
16
−12.5%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.11no data

FPS performance in popular games

  • Full HD
    Low Preset
  • Full HD
    Medium Preset
  • Full HD
    High Preset
  • Full HD
    Ultra Preset
  • Full HD
    Epic Preset
  • 1440p
    High Preset
  • 1440p
    Ultra Preset
  • 1440p
    Epic Preset
  • 4K
    High Preset
  • 4K
    Ultra Preset
  • 4K
    Epic Preset
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
Valorant 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Atomic Heart 7−8
+250%
2−3
−250%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Counter-Strike 2 6−7 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 50−55
+257%
14
−257%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Fortnite 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
Forza Horizon 5 4−5 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 7−8 0−1
Metro Exodus 5−6 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 7
+75%
4−5
−75%
Valorant 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Battlefield 5 9−10
+800%
1−2
−800%
Cyberpunk 2077 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
Dota 2 24−27
+160%
10−11
−160%
Far Cry 5 5−6 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 12−14
+333%
3−4
−333%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 12−14
+85.7%
7−8
−85.7%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
+0%
4−5
+0%
Valorant 40−45
+69.2%
24−27
−69.2%
Fortnite 12−14
+1200%
1−2
−1200%
Counter-Strike 2 3−4 0−1
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 18−20
+850%
2−3
−850%
Grand Theft Auto V 1−2 0−1
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 21−24
+667%
3−4
−667%
Valorant 24−27
+1100%
2−3
−1100%
Cyberpunk 2077 2−3 0−1
Far Cry 5 4−5 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 6−7
+500%
1−2
−500%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4−5 0−1
Fortnite 5−6 0−1
Atomic Heart 2−3 0−1
Grand Theft Auto V 16−18
+6.7%
14−16
−6.7%
Valorant 12−14
+550%
2−3
−550%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1
Dota 2 7−8 0−1
Far Cry 5 3−4
+200%
1−2
−200%
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 0−1
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%
Fortnite 3−4
+50%
2−3
−50%

This is how K1100M and GeForce G210M compete in popular games:

  • K1100M is 13% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS, with 1440p resolution and the High Preset, the K1100M is 667% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • K1100M is ahead in 27 tests (96%)
  • there's a draw in 1 test (4%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.43 0.29
Recency 23 July 2013 15 June 2009
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 14 Watt

K1100M has a 737.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, and a 42.9% more advanced lithography process.

GeForce G210M, on the other hand, has 221.4% lower power consumption.

The Quadro K1100M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce G210M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce G210M is a mobile workstation one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
NVIDIA GeForce G210M
GeForce G210M

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1
244 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8
85 votes

Rate GeForce G210M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about Quadro K1100M or GeForce G210M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.