Arc 7-Cores iGPU vs Quadro K1100M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro K1100M with Arc 7-Cores iGPU, including specs and performance data.

K1100M
2013
2 GB GDDR5, 45 Watt
2.83

Arc 7-Cores iGPU outperforms K1100M by a whopping 507% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking796318
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.06no data
Power efficiency4.31no data
ArchitectureKepler (2012−2018)Xe LPG (2023)
GPU code nameGK107Meteor Lake iGPU
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date23 July 2013 (11 years ago)14 December 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$109.94 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3847
Core clock speed706 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2200 MHz
Number of transistors1,270 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)45 Wattno data
Texture fill rate22.59no data
Floating-point processing power0.5422 TFLOPSno data
ROPs16no data
TMUs32no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR5no data
Maximum RAM amount2 GBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed700 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth44.8 GB/sno data
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data
Display Port1.2no data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

Optimus+-
3D Vision Pro+no data
Mosaic+no data
nView Display Management+no data
Optimus+no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1212_2
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.2no data
Vulkan+-
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

K1100M 2.83
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 17.18
+507%

3DMark 11 Performance GPU

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

K1100M 1827
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 11795
+546%

3DMark Vantage Performance

3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a sea cave, the other displaying a space fleet attack on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to be used instead.

K1100M 8992
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 38592
+329%

3DMark Fire Strike Graphics

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Fire Strike shows off some realistic graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

K1100M 1341
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 8449
+530%

3DMark Cloud Gate GPU

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level 10 benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Just like Ice Storm benchmark, it has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

K1100M 9228
Arc 7-Cores iGPU 45644
+395%

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD17
−100%
34
+100%

Cost per frame, $

1080p6.47no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−660%
38
+660%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−313%
30−35
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−291%
85−90
+291%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−500%
18−20
+500%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−375%
55−60
+375%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Battlefield 5 4−5
−1325%
55−60
+1325%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−400%
35−40
+400%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−580%
34
+580%
Far Cry New Dawn 8−9
−488%
45−50
+488%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−313%
30−35
+313%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−291%
85−90
+291%
Metro Exodus 3−4
−1900%
60−65
+1900%
Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−571%
45−50
+571%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−375%
55−60
+375%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 23
−126%
52
+126%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 9−10
−333%
35−40
+333%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−2800%
27−30
+2800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
Cyberpunk 2077 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry 5 5−6
−600%
35
+600%
Forza Horizon 4 14−16
−633%
110−120
+633%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 21−24
−491%
130−140
+491%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 12−14
−483%
70−75
+483%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 4
−450%
22
+450%
Watch Dogs: Legion 35−40
−124%
85−90
+124%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5 5−6
−500%
30−33
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−800%
18−20
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 3−4
−567%
20−22
+567%
Hitman 3 8−9
−463%
45−50
+463%
Horizon Zero Dawn 7−8
−471%
40−45
+471%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 2−3
−850%
18−20
+850%
Watch Dogs: Legion 16−18
−518%
100−110
+518%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7
−483%
35−40
+483%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry New Dawn 2−3
−500%
12−14
+500%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 2−3
−400%
10−11
+400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 1−2
−500%
6−7
+500%
Far Cry 5 1−2
−800%
9−10
+800%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 24−27
Watch Dogs: Legion 1−2
−600%
7−8
+600%

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2 4−5
−500%
24−27
+500%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Hitman 3 21−24
+0%
21−24
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Metro Exodus 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Battlefield 5 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 9−10
+0%
9−10
+0%
Hitman 3 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%
Horizon Zero Dawn 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Metro Exodus 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Red Dead Redemption 2 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Battlefield 5 16−18
+0%
16−18
+0%
Far Cry New Dawn 12−14
+0%
12−14
+0%

This is how K1100M and Arc 7-Cores iGPU compete in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 100% faster in 1080p

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Assassin's Creed Valhalla, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Arc 7-Cores iGPU is 2800% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • Arc 7-Cores iGPU is ahead in 40 tests (66%)
  • there's a draw in 21 test (34%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 2.83 17.18
Recency 23 July 2013 14 December 2023
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm

Arc 7-Cores iGPU has a 507.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, and a 460% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc 7-Cores iGPU is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K1100M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro K1100M is a mobile workstation card while Arc 7-Cores iGPU is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro K1100M
Quadro K1100M
Intel Arc 7-Cores iGPU
Arc 7-Cores iGPU

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 223 votes

Rate Quadro K1100M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 49 votes

Rate Arc 7-Cores iGPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.