RTX A40 vs Quadro FX Go 1400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV41MGA102
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date25 February 2005 (19 years ago)5 October 2020 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1710752
Core clock speed5 MHzno data
Boost clock speed330 MHz1755 MHz
Number of transistorsno data28,300 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data300 Watt
Texture fill rateno data589.7
Floating-point performanceno data37.74 gflops

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data8-pin EPS

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB48 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speedno data14.5 GB/s
Memory bandwidthno data695.8 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno data3x DisplayPort

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2005 5 October 2020
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 48 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX A40 has an age advantage of 15 years, a 19100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX Go 1400 and RTX A40. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX Go 1400 is a mobile workstation card while RTX A40 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400
Quadro FX Go 1400
NVIDIA RTX A40
RTX A40

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.4 393 votes

Rate RTX A40 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.