GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile vs Quadro FX Go 1400

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated124
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data22.41
Architectureno dataAmpere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameNV41MGA104
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
Release date25 February 2005 (19 years ago)12 January 2021 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores175120
Core clock speed5 MHz1110 MHz
Boost clock speed330 MHz1560 MHz
Number of transistorsno data17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology130 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data125 Watt
Texture fill rateno data249.6
Floating-point processing powerno data15.97 TFLOPS
ROPsno data80
TMUsno data160
Tensor Coresno data160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargelarge
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type256GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectXno data12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.5
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.2
CUDA-8.6

Pros & cons summary


Recency 25 February 2005 12 January 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 130 nm 8 nm

RTX 3070 Mobile has an age advantage of 15 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1525% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX Go 1400 and GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX Go 1400 is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX Go 1400
Quadro FX Go 1400
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile
GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Quadro FX Go 1400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1855 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.