A100 SXM4 vs Quadro FX 880M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.16no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Ampere (2020−2024)
GPU code nameGT216GA100
Market segmentMobile workstationWorkstation
Release date7 January 2010 (14 years ago)14 May 2020 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores486912
Core clock speed550 MHz1410 MHz
Number of transistors486 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate8.800609.1
Floating-point processing power0.1162 TFLOPS19.49 TFLOPS
ROPs8160
TMUs16432
Tensor Coresno data432

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-A (3.0)PCIe 4.0 x16
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3HBM2E
Maximum RAM amount1 GB40 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit5120 Bit
Memory clock speed790 MHz1215 MHz
Memory bandwidth25.28 GB/s1,555 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA1.28.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 7 January 2010 14 May 2020
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 40 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 400 Watt

FX 880M has 1042.9% lower power consumption.

A100 SXM4, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 10 years, a 3900% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 471.4% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 880M and A100 SXM4. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 880M is a mobile workstation card while A100 SXM4 is a workstation one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M
Quadro FX 880M
NVIDIA A100 SXM4
A100 SXM4

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 41 vote

Rate Quadro FX 880M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 178 votes

Rate A100 SXM4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.