Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile vs Quadro FX 770M

VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1206not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.13no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameG96Picasso
Market segmentMobile workstationDesktop
Release date14 August 2008 (16 years ago)22 October 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$527 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores32704
Core clock speed500 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1400 MHz
Number of transistors314 million4,940 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate8.00061.60
Floating-point processing power0.08 TFLOPS1.971 TFLOPS
ROPs88
TMUs1644

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3System Shared
Maximum RAM amount512 MBSystem Shared
Memory bus width128 BitSystem Shared
Memory clock speed800 MHzSystem Shared
Memory bandwidth25.6 GB/sno data
Shared memory-no data

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 August 2008 22 October 2019
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 15 Watt

RX Vega 11 Mobile has an age advantage of 11 years, a 364.3% more advanced lithography process, and 133.3% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 770M and Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 770M is a mobile workstation card while Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 770M
Quadro FX 770M
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile
Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 31 vote

Rate Quadro FX 770M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 29 votes

Rate Radeon RX Vega 11 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.