ATI Mach 64 GX vs Quadro FX 5800

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in performance ranking750not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.04no data
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)no data
GPU code nameGT200BMach64 GX
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date11 November 2008 (15 years ago)1 January 1995 (29 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,499 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores240no data
Core clock speed610 MHz10 MHz
Number of transistors1,400 million1 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm600 nm
Power consumption (TDP)189 Wattno data
Texture fill rate48.80no data
Floating-point performance0.6221 gflopsno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Length267 mmno data
Width2-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3VRAM
Maximum RAM amount4 GB2 MB
Memory bus width512 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed1600 MHz10 MHz
Memory bandwidth102.4 GB/s80.0 MB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x DisplayPort, 1x S-Video1x DB13W3

API compatibility

List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)None
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3None
OpenCL1.1None
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.3-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 November 2008 1 January 1995
Maximum RAM amount 4 GB 2 MB
Chip lithography 55 nm 600 nm

FX 5800 has an age advantage of 13 years, a 204700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 990.9% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Quadro FX 5800 and Mach 64 GX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Quadro FX 5800 is a workstation graphics card while Mach 64 GX is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800
Quadro FX 5800
ATI Mach 64 GX
Mach 64 GX

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 27 votes

Rate Quadro FX 5800 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 11 votes

Rate Mach 64 GX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.