GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile vs Quadro FX 570M

Place in the ranking	1348	185
Place by popularity	not in top-100	not in top-100
Power efficiency	0.41	18.12
Architecture	Tesla (2006−2010)	Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code name	G84	TU106
Market segment	Mobile workstation	Laptop
Release date	1 June 2007 (17 years ago)	29 January 2019 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	32	1920
Core clock speed	475 MHz	960 MHz
Boost clock speed	no data	1200 MHz
Number of transistors	289 million	10,800 million
Manufacturing process technology	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	115 Watt
Texture fill rate	7.600	144.0
Floating-point processing power	0.0608 TFLOPS	4.608 TFLOPS
ROPs	8	48
TMUs	16	120
Tensor Cores	no data	240
Ray Tracing Cores	no data	30

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop size	medium sized	large
Interface	PCIe 1.0 x16	PCIe 3.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR3	GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Memory bus width	128 Bit	192 Bit
Memory clock speed	700 MHz	1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth	22.4 GB/s	336.0 GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors	No outputs	No outputs
G-SYNC support	-	+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Ready

no data

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX	11.1 (10_0)	12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model	4.0	6.5
OpenGL	3.3	4.6
OpenCL	1.1	1.2
Vulkan	N/A	1.2.131
CUDA	1.1	7.5

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD	0−1	104
1440p	0−1	67
4K	-0−1	38

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

2−3

−2350%

45−50
+2350%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −2933%	91 +2933%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −4300%	88 +4300%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1975%	83 +1975%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2688%	223 +2688%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −3600%	148 +3600%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −711%	227 +711%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −3467%	107 +3467%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −3850%	79 +3850%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1775%	75 +1775%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −2350%	196 +2350%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2975%	123 +2975%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −589%	60−65 +589%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −579%	190 +579%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	3−4 −1567%	50 +1567%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	2−3 −2800%	58 +2800%
Cyberpunk 2077	2−3 −2350%	45−50 +2350%
Hitman 3	4−5 −1550%	66 +1550%
Horizon Zero Dawn	8−9 −1075%	94 +1075%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	4−5 −2575%	107 +2575%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	9−10 −567%	60 +567%
Watch Dogs: Legion	27−30 −35.7%	38 +35.7%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077	0−1	20−22
Hitman 3	6−7 −667%	46 +667%
Horizon Zero Dawn	2−3 −3400%	70 +3400%

1440p
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−3000%

62
+3000%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	1−2 −2400%	25 +2400%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	0−1	22

4K
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

2−3

−1400%

30
+1400%

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	71 +0%	71 +0%
Battlefield 5	119 +0%	119 +0%
Far Cry 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	110 +0%	110 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	366 +0%	366 +0%
Metro Exodus	130 +0%	130 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	100 +0%	100 +0%

Full HD
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	56 +0%	56 +0%
Battlefield 5	105 +0%	105 +0%
Far Cry 5	85 +0%	85 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	82 +0%	82 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	280 +0%	280 +0%
Metro Exodus	112 +0%	112 +0%
Red Dead Redemption 2	75 +0%	75 +0%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Valhalla	48 +0%	48 +0%
Far Cry 5	62 +0%	62 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	88 +0%	88 +0%

Full HD
Epic Preset

Red Dead Redemption 2

+0%

1440p
High Preset

Battlefield 5	65 +0%	65 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	54 +0%	54 +0%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	40 +0%	40 +0%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	38 +0%	38 +0%
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	42 +0%	42 +0%
Far Cry 5	42 +0%	42 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	246 +0%	246 +0%
Metro Exodus	55−60 +0%	55−60 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	65−70 +0%	65−70 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	210 +0%	210 +0%

4K
High Preset

Battlefield 5	32 +0%	32 +0%
Far Cry New Dawn	30 +0%	30 +0%
Hitman 3	28 +0%	28 +0%
Horizon Zero Dawn	86 +0%	86 +0%
Metro Exodus	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	39 +0%	39 +0%

4K
Ultra Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	20 +0%	20 +0%
Cyberpunk 2077	8−9 +0%	8−9 +0%
Far Cry 5	21 +0%	21 +0%
Forza Horizon 4	40−45 +0%	40−45 +0%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	35−40 +0%	35−40 +0%
Watch Dogs: Legion	15 +0%	15 +0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the RTX 2060 Mobile is 4300% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

RTX 2060 Mobile is ahead in 29 tests (41%)
there's a draw in 41 test (59%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score	0.27	30.41
Recency	1 June 2007	29 January 2019
Maximum RAM amount	512 MB	6 GB
Chip lithography	80 nm	12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)	45 Watt	115 Watt

FX 570M has 155.6% lower power consumption.

RTX 2060 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11163% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 566.7% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro FX 570M in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 570M is a mobile workstation card while GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.