ATI Radeon X800 GTO vs Quadro FX 570

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared Quadro FX 570 with Radeon X800 GTO, including specs and performance data.

FX 570
2007
256 MB DDR2, 38 Watt
0.57
+90%

FX 570 outperforms ATI X800 GTO by an impressive 90% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12101332
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency1.030.42
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)R400 (2004−2008)
GPU code nameG84R423
Market segmentWorkstationDesktop
Release date12 September 2007 (17 years ago)29 December 2007 (16 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better.

no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed460 MHz400 MHz
Number of transistors289 million160 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)38 Watt49 Watt
Texture fill rate3.6804.800
Floating-point processing power0.02944 TFLOPSno data
ROPs812
TMUs812

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2DDR
Maximum RAM amount256 MB128 MB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz350 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s22.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video

API compatibility

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0b (9_2)
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.32.0
OpenCL1.1N/A
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmark performance

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

FX 570 0.57
+90%
ATI X800 GTO 0.30

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

FX 570 220
+93%
ATI X800 GTO 114

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.57 0.30
Recency 12 September 2007 29 December 2007
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 128 MB
Chip lithography 80 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 38 Watt 49 Watt

FX 570 has a 90% higher aggregate performance score, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 62.5% more advanced lithography process, and 28.9% lower power consumption.

ATI X800 GTO, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 months.

The Quadro FX 570 is our recommended choice as it beats the Radeon X800 GTO in performance tests.

Be aware that Quadro FX 570 is a workstation graphics card while Radeon X800 GTO is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA Quadro FX 570
Quadro FX 570
ATI Radeon X800 GTO
Radeon X800 GTO

Comparisons with similar GPUs

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.9 16 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 33 votes

Rate Radeon X800 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.